On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 01:56:47PM -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 6/10/2021 11:46 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote: > > I vote as follows. > > > >> ID Author(s) AI Title > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> 8561& G., nix 2.0 Election Cycle > > AGAINST > > > > [Just because it makes the text a bit longer. Maybe I could be > > persuaded the current system is sufficiently bad that I should vote for > > this.] > > The impetus for this is that we have several "very stable" officeholders > (myself as Arbitor included), and it may seem like a social taboo to > challenge them in an election. By making it automatic, it removes the > taboo - throwing your hat in the ring during an ongoing > automatically-started election is not an aggressive anti-incumbent move > the way starting an election is. > > There was also thinking that, even if the incumbent is the only nominee, > the election gives a specific context for feedback on the job they're > doing, asking for improvements, etc. > > -G.
I change my vote on Proposal 8561 to: endorse G.. -- Falsifian
