There's some counterarguments and a couple precedents backing them up, but
honestly can't be bothered to explore this one as opposed to just playing
blackjack. I withdraw the quoted CFJ.
On 1/26/2020 2:11 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 3:08 PM Kerim
Warrigal wrote:
> I intended to realize the infinite shoe
I object, just in case.
-twg
On 1/26/20 3:50 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> I know next to nothing about blackjack, but that sounds like it might be
> difficult if the "shoe" is "infinite" as Warrigal says in eir pledge.
> And anyway, it's only two coins and promises to be, if not amusing, at
> least mildly
Matthew Berlin wrote:
> If you publish a hash of the shoe beforehand, and the entire shoe
> afterwards for verification of the hash, you might get more takers,
I know next to nothing about blackjack, but that sounds like it might be
difficult if the "shoe" is "infinite" as Warrigal says in eir
