If the rank of the mine at (0,2) is exactly 4 [if the scam was successful],
I perform the actions enclosed within the following curly braces: {
I destroy 6 lumber and 4 stones and 18 coins [what I would have spent on
upkeep].
I destroy the orchard at (2,1).
}The mine & refinery were created & upgraded in the original message, and I had the ore with which I created that large amount of coins before the scam. I got some apples from the orchard, but I spent those walking around to build that orchard. ~Corona On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:02 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 May 2018, Corona wrote: > > Consent - Rule 2519, maybe? > > The thing is, I think it requires a contract to pass on act-on-behalf, > and quazie can't consent or sign a contract? I really dunno. Someone > else have an idea if one-sided consent be given by some mechanism, that > a zombie can then use? > > > Is that so? I can just destroy the assets myself tomorrow, I'm about to > > hit the hay now. > > Thanks for being willing to destroy assets :). Main concern is if things > get so unbalanced it makes land for the next weeks/months unplayable, there > should be a bit of a reset (while still giving you some reasonable amount > of nifty profits for finding the loophole). Genuinely, without any > Treasuror reports I have absolutely no idea where we are, it felt like > that last set of actions crossed the line to needing some reset but IDK... > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, Corona wrote: > > > > I give consent to Quazie to transfer... assets from any of my > facilities > > > > to emself until the end of this month. > > > > > > How do you give consent? > > > > > > But more importantly, this has firmly passed my threshold of abuse too. > > > > > > Corona, once a bug has been pointed out, it's generally considered to > be > > > poor form to keep exploiting it while fixes are being worked out. > > > > > > Similar in principle to fixing V.J. Rada's contract mistake, I would > vote > > > for a range of options that directly strip the gains from Corona due to > > > continued exploitation of this loophole (allowing keeping of the first > > > message's gains). Hard for me to write such a proposal as I haven't > been > > > tracking quantities. > > > > > > -G. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
