On 12/13/20 1:04 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 11:19:39AM -0500, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via 
> agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 12/6/20 7:01 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/6/20 5:57 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>> On 12/6/20 6:56 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
>>>>> I point a finger at me for Tardiness on the Webmastor report.
>>>>>
>>>>> I point a finger at G. for Tardiness on the Coopor report.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe doesn't work for lack of a rule specification:
>>>>
>>>>>        A player CAN by announcement, but subject to the provisions of
>>>>>        this rule, Point eir Finger at a person (the perp) who plays the
>>>>>        game; the announcement has to explicitly name the perp and cite a
>>>>>        specific rule and an alleged violation of that rule by that
>>>>>        person.
>>>> --
>>>> Jason Cobb
>>>>
>>>> Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
>>>>
>>> Well that's obtuse. Why do we name the crimes if the names aren't 
>>> sufficient identifiers?
>>>
>>> If I didn't already do so in my last message, I point a finger at me for 
>>> Tardiness on the Webmastor report, citing rule 2143.
>>>
>>> If I didn't already do so in my last message, I point a finger at G. for 
>>> Tardiness on the Coopor report, citing rule 2143.
>>>
>>
>> We made it that specific after someone had made very vague accusations.
>>
>> Title: Specified Crime not Rule
>> Authors: PSS, nix
>> Power: 1.7
>> Text: {
>> Amend Rule 2478, "Vigilante Justice" by replacing the first paragraph
>> with the following:
>>       A player CAN by announcement, but subject to the provisions of
>>       this rule, Point eir Finger at a person (the perp) who plays the
>>       game; the announcement has to explicitly name the perp and cite a
>>       specific rule and an alleged violation of that rule by that
>>       person or a named crime alleged to have been committed by that
>>       person.
> 
> I had a bit of trouble parsing the part after the semicolon (maybe due
> to "and ... and ... or" without bracketing). Also your phrasing doesn't
> require the Pointer to point out how the perp committed the crime (in
> the case of a rule they have to include "an alleged violation"). How
> about
> 
>       ...the announcement has to explicitly name the perp, cite a
>       specific rule or named crime, and specify an alleged violation of
>       that rule or commission of that crime by that person.
> 

I submit but do not pend the following proposal:


Title: Specified Crime not Rule
Authors: PSS, nix
Power: 1.7
Text: {
Amend Rule 2478, "Vigilante Justice" by replacing the first paragraph
with the following:
      A player CAN by announcement, but subject to the provisions of
      this rule, Point eir Finger at a person (the perp) who plays the
      game; the announcement has to explicitly name the perp, cite a
      specific rule or named crime, and specify an alleged violation of
      that rule or commission of that crime by that person.
[ This will allow someone to use the name of a crime without specifying
which rule defines it. ]
}
-- 
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate
Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth

Reply via email to