I object to Corona’s attempt, because the dynasty isn’t over just yet (will
be soon though).
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 06:35, Corona wrote:
> Without objection I intend to retract every pledge I own. (the BlogNomic
> one is no longer useful, too)
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:02 AM,
I bid:
16 coins in Auction 1,
15 coins in Auction 2,
14 coins in Auction 3,
10 coins in Auction 4,
10 coins in Auction 5.
-G.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> There are currently more public, unpreserved, non-aether land units in
> existence than I feel like counting. 5
I bid:
17 coins in Auction 1,
16 coins in Auction 2,
15 coins in Auction 3,
11 coins in Auction 4,
11 coins in Auction 5.
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I bid:
> 16 coins in Auction 1,
> 15 coins in Auction 2,
> 14 coins in Auction 3,
> 10
[Other than the Assessor's voting resolution attempts (multiple), the only
thing sent to OFF (as per mail-archive) since the email troubles is the
below. I've already CoE'd the report, but I'm re-doing the whole thing
because of announcements of intent. Though now that you mention it, Ørjan
I bid 17 coins in Auction 2.
I bid 16 coins in Auction 3.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Corona wrote:
> I bid:
> 17 coins in Auction 1,
> 16 coins in Auction 2,
> 15 coins in Auction 3,
> 11 coins in Auction 4,
> 11 coins in Auction 5.
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Kerim
I Rubberstamp (as Herald) the proposal "No quorum, no medal", having
received no objections.
~Corona
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Corona wrote:
> Nah, I'd get rid of carrying the nominations over - if people don't care
> to give you a Medal of Honour, there's no reason to assume they will
Oops. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one has been resolved. I retract my prior
CFJ, and CFJ "Proposal 8050 has been resolved."
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:34 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Er, might want to check the Proposal # in the CFJ statement...
>
> I'll re-send the resolution to converge
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Oops. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one has been resolved. I retract my prior
> CFJ, and CFJ "Proposal 8050 has been resolved."
Gratuitous: The email in question was delivered to my own inbox via the list
reasonably quickly after I sent it. I'm
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:48 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > Oops. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one has been resolved. I retract my
> prior
> > CFJ, and CFJ "Proposal 8050 has been resolved."
>
> Except now - haha - I made a second, hopefully successful
If I have not previous resolved decisions to adopt Proposals 8050-8052,
I resolve them as indicated in the original message below.
[Please confirm receipt, someone!]
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kerim Aydin
To: Agora Official
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 14:00 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> If I have not previous resolved decisions to adopt Proposals 8050-
> 8052, I resolve them as indicated in the original message below.
> [Please confirm receipt, someone!]
I've received messages from you with the following subject lines:
CoE: If Proposal 8052 was not resolved at the time the below report section
was published, it is in error because omd was a zombie at the time.
(this prevents some weird effect of ratifying omd as a non-zombie prior
to proposal 8052 taking effect).
I accept this CoE (conditional on the
Just checked the unofficial OFF mail archive. The message got eaten on its
way to me, and maybe some other people, but definitely went to, which is
super scary.
I CFJ "Proposal 1905 has been resolved."
Arguments:
Per CFJ 1905, non-receipt of a message by those who have arraigned to
receive
13 matches
Mail list logo
