I object to the intention to enter CFJ 3672 into moot.
> On Oct 29, 2018, at 12:49 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> No autocracies please. If CFJ 3672 has been judged, then I intend With 2
> Support to enter its judgement into Moot.
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>> On
No autocracies please. If CFJ 3672 has been judged, then I intend With 2
Support to enter its judgement into Moot.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, October 29, 2018 2:11 PM, D Margaux wrote:
> From the Arbitor’s Weekly:
>
> > 3672 called 15 October 2018 by D. Margaux,
D. Margaux wrote:
> I CFJ this statement: “D. Margaux’s attempt in this message to assign CFJ
> 3672 to emself was EFFECTIVE.”
G. wrote:
> I favor this CFJ.
The above is CFJ 3681. I assign it to G.
Ah, you're right. I used this in a different way last year and thought
we fixed that definition.
I favor this CFJ.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
> > On Oct 29, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> >> From the Arbitor’s Weekly:
>
From the Arbitor’s Weekly:
> 3672 called 15 October 2018 by D. Margaux, assigned to Trigon 20
> October 2018: "Trigon, twg, D. Margaux, G., and L could win the game
> by announcement under rule 2580 on the Effective Date after the
> expungement of Trigon's blot."
I issue a cabinet order of
