Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Intent to award Employee of the Year 2021
I support each of Murphy's intents to award the title "Employee of the Year" On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 1:10 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 5/2/22 22:39, Sarah S. via agora-business wrote: > > I support the intent below. > > > This fails. There is no single such intent. > > -- > Jason Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > >
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Intent to award Employee of the Year 2021
On 5/2/22 22:39, Sarah S. via agora-business wrote: > I support the intent below. This fails. There is no single such intent. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Intent to award Employee of the Year 2021
On 5/1/22 23:32, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> On 5/1/2022 7:28 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
>> On 5/1/22 19:20, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
>>> For each of the players in the following {}-delimited list, I intend
>>> (with 2 Agoran Consent) to award em the Patent Title of Employee of the
>>> Year 2021 (which will be allowed by Herald regulation HR4 if enacted):
>>>
>>> {ais523, Aspen, ATMunn, Falsifian, G., Jason, Murphy, nix, R. Lee,
>>> Telna, Trigon}
>> I support the intents for Aspen, G., Jason, Murphy, nix, and Trigon
>>
>> By my calculations from the included table, these people did 52 weeks/12
>> months worth of reports in 2021.
>>
> I object to my own award - I've mostly been doing easier stuff.
>
> My feeling is that "52 weeks" as a criterion is basically 12-Months Long
> Service, and that's a different title - among everyone, Aspen and Trigon's
> work feels above-and-beyond.
>
> I support for Aspen
> I support for Trigon.
>
I support the same two intents.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Intent to award Employee of the Year 2021
On 5/1/2022 7:28 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> On 5/1/22 19:20, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
>> For each of the players in the following {}-delimited list, I intend
>> (with 2 Agoran Consent) to award em the Patent Title of Employee of the
>> Year 2021 (which will be allowed by Herald regulation HR4 if enacted):
>>
>> {ais523, Aspen, ATMunn, Falsifian, G., Jason, Murphy, nix, R. Lee,
>> Telna, Trigon}
>
> I support the intents for Aspen, G., Jason, Murphy, nix, and Trigon
>
> By my calculations from the included table, these people did 52 weeks/12
> months worth of reports in 2021.
>
I object to my own award - I've mostly been doing easier stuff.
My feeling is that "52 weeks" as a criterion is basically 12-Months Long
Service, and that's a different title - among everyone, Aspen and Trigon's
work feels above-and-beyond.
I support for Aspen
I support for Trigon.
