Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3461 assigned to Alexis

[ais523]

On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 14:26 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> The final issue of the case is to assign a valid judgement to the CFJ. My
> options, per rule 591, are TRUE, FALSE, and DISMISS. DISMISS is not
> appropriate in the circumstances, based on the facts of the case at the
> time the CFJ was initiated and the text of rule 591, but the rules
> otherwise provide no guidance as to preferring TRUE over FALSE. Thus, I
> judge this CFJ FALSE.

Beautiful. I suppose this relies on an argument that TRUE is not the
same thing as true?

-- 
ais523

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3461 assigned to Alexis

[Nicholas Evans]

TtPF

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Nicholas Evans  wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Alexis Hunt  wrote:
>
>> The final issue of the case is to assign a valid judgement to the CFJ. My
>> options, per rule 591, are TRUE, FALSE, and DISMISS. DISMISS is not
>> appropriate in the circumstances, based on the facts of the case at the time
>> the CFJ was initiated and the text of rule 591, but the rules otherwise
>> provide no guidance as to preferring TRUE over FALSE. Thus, I judge this CFJ
>> FALSE.
>
> The rule does offer guidance:
>
> The valid judgements, based on the facts of the case at the time
>   the CFJ was initiated, are TRUE, FALSE, and DISMISS.
>
> FALSE doesn't appear to be a valid judgment if you believe the facts
> point towards TRUE.
>
> I motion to reconsider.