Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On 6/20/21 9:21 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > On 6/15/2021 12:11 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: >> 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility > I vote AGAINST this proposal. > > It's either a scam or bad security. In this bit: > >> 5. Non-Festive players are not eligible to object to intents to >> perform the following actions: >> >> a. Enact, amend, or repeal Emergency Regulations > we need to add to the fact that Emergency Regs can set Festivity. So if > you have control over an Emergency Reg, you can set the festivity high and > keep people out. > > I considered using festivity when doing the emergency reg scam back a few > months ago, and the fact that the PM could use some level of Agoran > Consent to change that was a big protection - so IMO it's a big > vulnerability to lock non-festival people out of changing emergency regs. > > -G. > I change my vote on that proposal to AGAINST It's not an (intentional) scam, though I think the better solution is to remove that ability from emergency regs than to let non-Festive people object to them. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On 2021-06-18 14:22, ais523 via agora-business wrote: On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 00:20 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: On 6/17/21 3:38 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation FOR I change this vote to AGAINST, per Falsifian. I also change my vote on this proposal to AGAINST. I also change my vote on this proposal to AGAINST.
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 00:20 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > On 6/17/21 3:38 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > > > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation > > FOR > > > I change this vote to AGAINST, per Falsifian. I also change my vote on this proposal to AGAINST. -- ais523
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On 6/17/21 3:38 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: >> 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation > FOR > > I change this vote to AGAINST, per Falsifian. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
Clarifying: On 2021-06-16 14:00, Telna via agora-business wrote: 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting periodFOR I vote FOR 8585. 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal DAGAINST I vote AGAINST 8592.
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 3:27 PM N. S. via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > I vote in this manner > 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill > FOR > 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 > FOR > 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening > AGAINST, the current version already works or arguably should work and this > new version is longer and is comma gore. > 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility > FOR > 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation > AGAINST - overlong and any nonconsensual auction regs would be objected to. > 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 > AGAINST - of course I support in principle but the wording would be very > much clearer if it were "an adoption index other than 'none'" > 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 > FOR > 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets > AGAINST > 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art > FOR > 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches > FOR > 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference > Endorse Aris. (my eyes glaze over) > 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period > FOR > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation > Enthusiastically FOR, nice job > 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period > Endorse Aris (eyes glazed over) > 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval > FOR > 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A > FOR > 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B > FOR > 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C > FOR > 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D > FOR > -- > From R. Lee > I change my vote to AGAINST 8588 -- >From R. Lee
