Michael Slone wrote:
The correctness of the Judge's blank assertion that the rules do not
designate the position of Speaker to be an office depends directly on
which if either of the above two interpretations of the first sentence
of Rule 1450 is correct. We therefore ought to set an explicit
On 2/2/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quazie wrote:
without any photo
evidence that e doesn't wear pineapple suits at all time,
http://www.fysh.org/~zefram/personal/pics/
I ment while playing Agora, and none of those pictures inform
Quazie wrote:
I ment while playing Agora, and none of those pictures inform me of how you
look while playing agora.
Admittedly most of those pictures are from the period between my 1997
deregistration and my recent re-registration. But in the final one,
with the diminutive infant Robin, I'm a
On 2/2/07, Zefram wrote:
Admittedly most of those pictures are from the period between my 1997
deregistration and my recent re-registration. But in the final one,
with the diminutive infant Robin, I'm a registered Player.
I guess what he's saying is that we would all like to see a picture of
Cecilius wrote:
*[12] *The term /voting index/ is defined by paragraph (c) of Rule 955
as the ratio of the strength of FOR to the strength of AGAINST.
*[13] *Looking to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, /ratio/ is
first defined as the indicated quotient of two mathematical
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I, for one, never implied that pineapple-ness, etc. was exclusive
of being a person. However, in the message quoted below, Zefram implies
(by switching back to being a human) that e believed that, in deeming
emself to be an avocado, e was deeming emself to not be a person.
I
First, this is a test case and there's many ways my
arguments are probably wrong.
Zefram wrote:
I did not perceive there to be any such agreement. I took actions
purely of my own will.
Counterargument: entering something of your own will is what
an agreement is: e.g. I agree to be legally
7 matches
Mail list logo
