Is anyone else defiantly inactive?
On 2/22/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal: Initialize Activity
Upon the adoption of this proposal, all players become active.
--
Brandon Kwaselow (Quazie)
University of Michigan LSA, Residential College
Computer Science
Quazie wrote:
Is anyone else defiantly inactive?
^
Is this typo intentional or merely serendipitous?
Anyway, some players may reasonably fit the English definition of
inactive. There are five things that depend on activity:
1) Requirement to receive PFs
2)
It all makes sense... which is unfortunate. Stupid English meanings
On 2/22/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the matter of CFJs 1618, 1619, and 1620:
As the ruleset does not supply a definition of active or inactive,
and neither law nor mathematics provides an applicable definition,
I
On 2/22/07, Quazie wrote:
Is anyone else defiantly inactive?
I hear you.
~Manu
4 matches
Mail list logo
