Ian Kelly wrote:
But I'm confused. What precisely is P supposed to represent in this context?
Specifically, I think, the Pineapple Partnership is not a person.
-zefram
Roger Hicks wrote:
Primo Corporation votes FOR proposal #4997.
It can't. VLDP=0 for non-natural persons.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
Pineapple Partnership 1
Primo Corporation
etc.
It'd be a lot clearer if you used explicit 0 entries rather than blanks.
-zefram
Then Primo casts all of its 0 votes :)
Sorry forgot the No Free Votes proposal went through.
BobTHJ
On 5/31/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Primo Corporation votes FOR proposal #4997.
It can't. VLDP=0 for non-natural persons.
-zefram
On 5/31/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The quorum for an Agoran decision is ceil(sqrt(NEV)), where NEV
^^^
This would look better written out.
I can't say I support the decrease in quorum.
--
C. Maud Image (Michael Slone)
Aww!
Michael Slone wrote:
This would look better written out.
Would the ceiling of ... be clear enough, or does it have to be
a postfix ... rounded up to the next integer? Or would fractional
quorum be OK, which gives the same effect?
I can't say I support the decrease in quorum.
Is it the decrease
On 5/31/07, Michael Slone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In classical logic, (~P - P) - P is a tautology, since ~P - P is
equivalent to P.
((~P - P) - P) - ((~P - P) - P)
-root
On 5/31/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The voting limit on democratic proposals (VLDP) is one for a
player who is a natural person, and zero for any other entity.
The voting limit on ordinary proposals (VLOP) is variable. The
default VLOP is 5 for a player who is a
Ed Murphy wrote:
Amend Rule 879 (Quorum) to read:
Do you realise that would wipe out the quorum fix that is currently
under vote?
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
Amend Rule 1959 (Voting Limits) to read:
Wrong number.
-zefram
root wrote:
My keyboard hereby registers as a player, and none of you can judge
otherwise.
Your keyboard is a pineapple. Now we've come full circle.
Also, can you prove you have the consent of your keyboard to bind
em to an agreement? Or to act on eir behalf? Otherwise you've
violated one
proto-proposal: generalise naturalhood
AI: 3
We're currently putting the phrase natural person into various rules.
As root has pointed out, this is hard-coding decisions that we might well
change later. This proto factors out the relevant aspect of personhood.
In its present form it doesn't
On 5/31/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root wrote:
My keyboard hereby registers as a player, and none of you can judge
otherwise.
Your keyboard is a pineapple. Now we've come full circle.
Also, can you prove you have the consent of your keyboard to bind
em to an agreement? Or to
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Ooh, no potential for future abuse there!
No more than in the current rules, certainly.
-zefram
On 5/31/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quorum for an Agoran decision is N/3 (where N is the number of
eligible voters), rounded up, with a minimum of five (unless this
is greater than N, in which quorum is N).
I think you
Just wanted to congratulate everyone on the second-most busy month in
agoranomic.org discussion history (measured by bytes in archive file).
Just thought we might make it, but conversation died out in the final
few hours.
Just barely lost out to April 2005; April 2005 had a April Fools
joke
I've heard Annabel mentioned several times. Is there someplace I could find
a synopsis of this crisis?
BobTHJ
On 5/31/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to congratulate everyone on the second-most busy month in
agoranomic.org discussion history (measured by bytes in archive
On 5/31/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just barely lost out to April 2005; April 2005 had a April Fools
joke that resulted in posting repeated copies of most of the
ruleset in discussion forum, so maybe that's not a measure of
discussion volume. On the other hand, current archives
Ian Kelly wrote:
On 5/31/07, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard Annabel mentioned several times. Is there someplace I
could find
a synopsis of this crisis?
I don't think that anybody has ever written up a thesis on the
subject, so your best bet is probably just to go digging
19 matches
Mail list logo