Eris wrote:
On 9/23/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goddess Eris 1 5 5 1R 2B
I should have 1 black VC, no?
You're right; your judgement on culpability was late, but your
judgement on sentencing wasn't (the ASAP timer didn't start
ticking until your
Ed Murphy wrote:
6) As soon as possible after a member requests credit, the Bankor
SHALL create in eir possession, for each color of VC in eir
possession, minimum(100*X-Y,0) kopecks of that color, where X is
the number of VCs of that color in eir possession, and Y is the
number of
Create a rule titled Charges to read as follows:
Charge is a switch with values +ve, -ne and neutral (default). Players
and rules are the only entities that posses a charge. Players are only
regulated by rules that have the same charge as them or neutral charge.
--
Peekee
On 9/24/07, Peekee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Players are only
regulated by rules that have the same charge as them or neutral charge.
The analogy to electrical charges doesn't seem to hold up very well.
-root
On 9/24/07, Peekee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patterns:
1) Line-Pattern: 3 or more contestant of the same party with distinct
collinear coordinates. Provided no item on the Agoran map breaks their
line.
What does it mean for an item on the map to break a line?
Points:
1) Upon a contestant's
On 9/24/07, Peekee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9/24/07, Peekee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patterns:
1) Line-Pattern: 3 or more contestant of the same party with distinct
collinear coordinates. Provided no item on the Agoran map breaks their
line.
Quoting Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9/24/07, Peekee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9/24/07, Peekee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patterns:
1) Line-Pattern: 3 or more contestant of the same party with distinct
collinear coordinates. Provided no item on the
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
If the AFO is not the vote collector, then I implicitly published
the results acting as myself.
I'm not convinced that you did. I think your ... publish the following:
bit makes the entire following report a subordinate clause.
Feel free to CFJ. I didn't
Ed Murphy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's the faulty one. It claims that the proposals were rejected,
but then reports votes that would cause the proposals to be adopted.
I accidentally omitted the * marks to indicate adoption, which I
think prompted the request for a non-blank mark to
On 9/24/07, Peekee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could not think of nice names for the groups. Any good analogies?
Power?:D
comex wrote:
5230 O1 1comex reintroduce players must follow the rul...
FOR*1048576 (Concerning Zefram's response, yes it does, combined with
R1742!)
What it actually reintroduces is the failed model of the rules are a
binding agreement. We've never actually adjudicated the rules
On Sep 24, 2007, at 1:05 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On 9/23/07, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I CFJ on the following statement: Upon joining Agora as a first-class
player, Pikhq obtained one white VC, and is of the white party.
I think everybody will agree with you in this case.
On 9/23/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eris wrote:
On 9/23/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goddess Eris 1 5 5 1R 2B
I should have 1 black VC, no?
You're right; your judgement on culpability was late, but your
judgement on sentencing
Taral wrote:
My judgement on culpability was late? I though I had to wait out the
pre-judgement period.
You are correct. You were not late.
-zefram
14 matches
Mail list logo
