Ed Murphy wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Rules as Contract
(AI = 3, II = 2, please)
...
A rule is a type of instrument with the capacity to govern
the game generally.
This is essentially the current equivalent of the Suber R101. This is
the claim that the rules are sovereign.
The
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
He got hit with two criminal CFJs for the same act. I'm trying to
find a way to dismiss the second one as double jeopardy
Make an ordinary ruling on culpability, but then sentence to DISCHARGE
(under the manifestly unjust provision) if the verdict is GUILTY.
-zefram
On 6/1/08, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm the father of a strong-willed 5 year old who thinks it is her duty
to keep her younger siblings in line by beating them when they refuse
to follow her instructions. Exasperated from having to discipline her
yet again for pushing her
On 6/1/08, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I preemptively consent to any judgment of REMAND this panel attempts to make.
BobTHJ
You can't do this anymore. Blame Agree2Support.
On 6/1/08, Ben Caplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about:
{This is a public contract and a pledge. This pledge CAN act on behalf
of BobTHJ. Upon any panelist in CFJ 1935a publishing intent to REMAND
that case, this pledge acts on behalf of BobTHJ to cause em to SUPPORT
that intent, and
On Sunday 1 June 2008 2:21:40 ihope wrote:
5537 D1 2Murphy Foreign trade
FOR
That is all.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
You should vote PRESENT on 5532-5536, that's what it's there for.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Ben Caplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 1 June 2008 3:41:29 comex wrote:
Except that pledges can't do things automatically. So really, he's out of
luck.
Why not?
Acting on behalf authority is pretty poorly defined already (being now
primarily a matter
On Sunday 1 June 2008 3:41:29 comex wrote:
Except that pledges can't do things automatically. So really, he's out of
luck.
Why not?
On Sunday 1 June 2008 4:28:29 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Ben Caplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Change the title of rule 2168 to Please don't fail quorum, and
I'm not fond of the title change.
What would you call it? The current title doesn't logically cover the
new
On May 29, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Monday 26 May 2008 8:50:16 Ed Murphy wrote:
Submitted by Pavitra:
I am my ordinal number.
I measure the diagonal.
I am the cry of the raven.
I record the metamorphoses.
I am the breath of the muse.
I weave the eternal golden braid.
I am the
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavitra asked me to post my wild shot in public:
First
?
Nevermore
Ovid
?
?
Warren
Havah or Eve or Lilit(h)... depends on which text you're using.
Gary Gygax
S
The initials of which produce something that fire
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Appellant ais523's Arguments:
Although my judgement is currently correct, it ought not to be. Using the
appeals process has the potential to delay a remanded or reassigned
judgement
until after OVERLOOKED has been
On Sunday 1 June 2008 5:47:42 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavitra asked me to post my wild shot in public:
First
?
Nevermore
Ovid
?
?
Warren
Havah or Eve or Lilit(h)... depends on which text you're using.
Gary
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:22 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal: An elephant sometimes forgets (AI=1.7, II=0)
I don't think this should be disinterested. It's a rather more than a bug fix.
-woggle
comex wrote:
On 6/1/08, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I preemptively consent to any judgment of REMAND this panel attempts to
make.
BobTHJ
You can't do this anymore. Blame Agree2Support.
Rule 2124 can be interpreted as allowing pre-emptive support.
15 matches
Mail list logo
