On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.eduwrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Registrar
office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
is the IADoP,
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
If any of the following actions are invalid, I perform none of them:
[...]
I harvest 1030 (recently-mutated rule, using X crops as necessary), with
a 2 (or an X, with 2 as the Seed), to create a 2 Ranch.
This would transform
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:32 -0400, Quazie wrote:
Wooble is how i vote.
Lowercase i? Are you gwen in disguise?
--
ais523
Wooble wrote:
I award myself the patent title Champion for my win by Championship.
I award myself the patent title Champion for my win by High Score.
In the interest of maintaining the Hall of Fame's historical
records (and my not having to hunt through the archives again),
what was the nature
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 12:25 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Wooble wrote:
I award myself the patent title Champion for my win by Championship.
I award myself the patent title Champion for my win by High Score.
In the interest of maintaining the Hall of Fame's historical
records (and my not
N.B. the ruleset has been ratified, but I'm not sure we haven't missed
knock-on effects to the gamestate. I think we still need a R1482
never contained that text ratification.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 22, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
These are only of academic
Rule 1551/12 (Power=3)
Ratification
A public document is part (possibly all) of a public message.
When a public document is ratified, the gamestate is modified so
that the ratified document was completely true and accurate at
the time it was published. Nevertheless, the
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Due to the report's ratification, our current gamestate takes that
report to have been accurate, so the act cannot have been illegal.
Nevertheless, the ratification of a
public document does not invalidate, reverse,
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
However, one interesting point here is
whether it's rule 106 or the proposal enacting the rules; it seems very
clear that it's the proposal itself (especially because it's the
proposal's power that matters to enact the rules), and interestingly,
there
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
[T]he ratified document was completely true and accurate _at the time
it was published_.
The gamestate is modified so that. Effects are limited to modifying
the gamestate in some way.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
e^(-kt).
...
I change my name to Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused
Nickname Permutation Overwhelming Initial Nickname Transparency
(CASEINPOINT).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
e^(-kt).
...
I change my name to Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused
Nickname Permutation Overwhelming Initial Nickname Transparency
12 matches
Mail list logo
