2009/6/8 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/6/7 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
In that case, I will gladly do the following:
I intend to, with support, initiate an election for the
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
chamber: democratic
ai: 2.0
interest: 1
proposer: Yally
coauthors: Murphy
title: IADoP CAN and SHALL
submit_date: 2009-05-27
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Denied. You made the proposal with the same title submitted
0. Yally can flip the contestmaster of this contract to emself by
announcement. If this occurs, this paragraph is removed from this contract’s
text.
1. This is a public contract.
2. The name of this contract is The Game.
3. Any player CAN become a party to this contract by announcement.
I lost The Game.
NttPF ;)
I lost the game as well.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on my full
nickname before it passes. I shall also insist on the long version after
it passes and violate the rule in civil protest. If you choose to blot me
I vote as follows:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
PRESENT
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
FOR
6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
FOR
6347 O 0 1.0 coppro Ribbon cleanup
FOR
6348 O 1 1.0 coppro B Friends
FOR
6349 D 1 2.0 Pavitra
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on my full
nickname before it passes. I shall also insist on the long version after
it passes
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on my full
nickname before it passes. I shall also
I lost The Game.
Not that game.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:07, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I lost The Game.
I won The Game. Thanks for playing, everyone.
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
The rule uses SHOULD not SHALL. Officers are only encouraged to use
the official nickname, not required to do so.
Nice. Punishment for no purpose. Now *that's* treating Agora right
good forever.
I shall choose no official nickname whatsoever, refer to
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Disclaimer: The text of proposals below may or may not be correct.
I've had to guess what each person submitting a proposal intended to
type into their email client when submitting a message. It's entirely
possible this
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
For each Agoran Decision currently in its voting period, if FOR is a
valid option for that decision, I cast a number of ballots FOR on that
decision equal to my voting limit on that decision.
If you're that lazy, why not just
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:11, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I award myself a Yellow Ribbon.
I performed duties related to 3-Scroll Rodney in a timely manner during May.
I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2234, a power-1
Rule, by failing
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I announce my intent to, with Support, initiate an election for the office
of Grand Poobah.
-G.
And why might that be?
Sgeo wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
For each Agoran Decision currently in its voting period, if FOR is a
valid option for that decision, I cast a number of ballots FOR on that
decision equal to my voting limit on that decision.
If you're that lazy,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sgeosgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora.
H. Assessor: please evaluate this as a conditional vote evaluating to no vote :P
Charles Walker wrote:
The Porter
You misspelled Portor. :P
Actually, I think this should be called something more obviously
descriptive of its function -- in particular, something that makes the
office's function clear to new players.
Perhaps Greetor?
Sgeo wrote:
AGAINST -- It's probably my imagination, but I think that could be
interpreted to mean that once those conditions come about, anyone can
destroy any rests..
If so, the bug is in the current Ruleset (but harder to exploit).
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles Walker wrote:
The Porter
You misspelled Portor. :P
Actually, I think this should be called something more obviously
descriptive of its function -- in particular, something that makes the
office's
Wooble wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sgeosgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora.
H. Assessor: please evaluate this as a conditional vote evaluating to no vote
:P
Done, on the grounds
Charles Walker wrote:
Unless the rule defining a class of Secret Information states otherwise,
Secret Information ceases to be Secret one Agoran quarter after its
creation; it is then LEGAL and ENCOURAGED to disclose and discuss such
information.
An Agoran quarter is an absolute period of
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Okay, so I've run into a problem. The report published on 19 May has
self-ratified. Some monthly duties for May were performed in the time
between 1 and 17 May, earned notes for their performers at that time
(incorrectly). So Herald Gravity, Notary
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/6/7 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
2009/6/7 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 01:45 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
1 Jun 2009 00:00 - ais523 +A judgment, +A# monthly duties, +3B weekly
duties
CoE: The II-3 Notary has monthly duties
2009/6/8 Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
I submit the following three proposals:
{
Official Secrets Act
AI = 1, II = 2
Create a new Power 1 Rule, titled The Official Secrets Act with the
following text:
This is going to run afoul of Rule 101 unless you amend it. Also,
let's
2009/6/9 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
2009/6/8 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Okay, so I've run into a problem. The report published on 19 May has
self-ratified. Some monthly duties for May were performed in the time
between 1 and 17 May, earned notes for
2009/6/8 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Okay, so I've run into a problem. The report published on 19 May has
self-ratified. Some monthly duties for May were performed in the time
between 1 and 17 May, earned notes for their performers at that time
(incorrectly). So Herald
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
This is the weekly Notary report; for more details, see
http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/ (may not always be up-to-date, but is
usually up to date to the best of my knowledge at the time of a Notary
report).
H. Notary, would it be possible to add a (bare
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I lost The Game.
I won The Game. Thanks for playing, everyone.
You did not. Check out losethegame.com
Rolden 1+ 1i
Seriously, who is this Rolden guy!?!
--
--Rodlen
He is well aware.
On 2009-06-09, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I lost The Game.
I won The Game. Thanks for playing, everyone.
You
BobTHJ wrote:
I don't see a claim from Murphy on FRC and Cookie Jar, so I am not
awarding contestmaster points for these at this time.
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2009-June/020746.html
Tiger wrote:
Okay, so I've run into a problem. The report published on 19 May has
self-ratified. Some monthly duties for May were performed in the time
between 1 and 17 May, earned notes for their performers at that time
(incorrectly). So Herald Gravity, Notary ais523 and Rulekeepor comex
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I CFJ: The recent Scorekeepor's report included Rodlen's score.
I CFJ: Rolden has published a message.
When a misspelling is accidental, as in the Scorekeepor's report, it is
generally accepted as a reasonable synonym. But what happens when it is
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 23:22, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Rolden 1+ 1i
Admitted.
BobTHJ
37 matches
Mail list logo
