Warrigal wrote:
I cease to agree to all non-binding agreements.
I agree to the following:
{The name of this Legalistic public contract is ə (that is, the
Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER SCHWA). The parties to this
contract SHALL ensure that it fulfills all of its obligations. A party
2009/6/13 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
3. Each card type has a frequency in each deck (a matrix). Legislative is
mostly vote power cards; Judicial (obvious); Academic is Proposal
distribution cards. Bureucratic deals with offices. Some chance of
drawing a roll again from a
2009/6/14 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Disagree, is binding.
I'm sorry, but that doesn't seem to be a sentence. Are you saying I
disagree; it's binding? 'Disagree' is binding? Something else which
would actually make sense to me in this context?
--Warrigal
Warrigal wrote:
2009/6/14 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Disagree, is binding.
I'm sorry, but that doesn't seem to be a sentence. Are you saying I
disagree; it's binding? 'Disagree' is binding? Something else which
would actually make sense to me in this context?
--Warrigal
I'm saying I
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Result: strategy, more cards can be defined with probabilities a mix of
choice and random.
What do you think, worth the complication with it getting as cross-matrixed
as notes but associated with specialties? A better way to do committees?
Yes/no/maybe?
Interesting. I
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Charles
Walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I submit the following proposal and intend to make it Distributable
without objection:
I agree to the following:
{{
This is
1. Cards are dealt from an infinite deck (with set probabilities) and
destroyed when played. Reason: the reason cards broke so often in the
* Title: Discard Picking (30)
Exploit: Indicate a card that was played or discarded in the
past 72 hours. It
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I transfer a prop from myself to BobTHJ because I really like his
Proposal Review Board idea, and I've stolen parts of it for this
proto:
What do people think about a proto pool in general? Something like
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying I dislike this contract, because it is binding to anyone who
becomes party to it.
I think non-binding contracts were judged to spontaneously implode at
some point.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying I dislike this contract, because it is binding to anyone who
becomes party to it.
I think non-binding contracts were judged to spontaneously implode at
some point.
It's just an
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying I dislike this contract, because it is binding to anyone who
becomes party to it.
I think non-binding contracts were
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
It's just an oxymoron, like jumbo shrimp.
Jumbo shrimp aren't an oxymoron. You're thinking of swiss cheese.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
This is a public contract and a pledge, entitled coppro's Grand Poobah
Promotion/Demotion Policy.
I'll come out and say this; if you're looking for a scrupulously spelled-
out policy, I am not your candidate.
In the end, I'm guessing several first-class
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 15:34 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
NOTE: The above contest thresholds are based on how the contract
awards points. AAA and 3-Scroll both award points based on limited
actions that members are permitted to perform, thus awards are limited
by the contract mechanisms. Cookie
Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 20:04 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/6/11 Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com:
I CFJ on the following:
What is forced by rule 2029 to Dance a Powerful Dance?
Ye Marvy, of course.
I call for judgement on the statement A Powerful Dance is an
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 02:21 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
I cease to agree to all non-binding agreements.
As the notary, I think the only effect this has is to cancel any
contract creation attempts you made in the past which failed because
they weren't taken up by other players.
--
ais523
Notary
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
If no player has posted a
2009/6/14 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
This does not apply to bribes made prior to em being elected, meaning e
could be buying votes.
Bit defensive of your office there? C'mon, I know you don't like G.,
but that's an unfounded accusation.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
I'll amend that; If elected, I pledge not to let material bribes made to
myself (or persons I specify) while I hold office (e.g. assets, votes on
proposals, props, or promises of same) affect whom I promote; I can
terminate this pledge
2009/6/14 Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com:
Gratuitous: contracts, including pledges, generally don't require public
messages. It's possible to make a pledge to a-d, or by private email. If
G.'s intent was to make a pledge immediately, then that's probably what
happened.
Or does
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
If any of the above harvesting actions failed, I do those actions
again using Xs where needed.
This isn't necessary; X crop usage is now implied if necessary.
2009/6/15 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I create a digit ranch with a seed of 9 in BobTHJ's possession.
I create a digit ranch with a seed of 7 in BobTHJ's possession.
One of these was a purchase. I revoke 3
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I spend D# D# D# to flip the Distributability of the Proposal entitled
No More Distributability to Undistributable.
II-2 is unreasonable for a proposal that replaces a rule with the
exact text it had very recently.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I transfer one prop from myself to CotC Murphy for not getting all my ducks
in a row before the CFJ:
Another gratuitous argument on my most recent CFJ:
There was indeed at least one proposal that went into the pool
I think that if we retire Notes, we should retire Rests too. As it
stands, Rests are the only punishment Agora has to offer for any
infraction whatsoever, which is pretty bad. Consider:
Distributability is a mess and has significantly removed the
attractiveness of submitting proposals. It is an
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
[Tiger is sitting, thus I cannot honor eir favoring without violating
the prohibition against assigning a poorly qualified judge. I could
wait for the next rotation, but at risk of violating the requirement
to assign a
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I vote PRESENT in the Anarchist election. (This is effective
iff my previous attempt was not.)
I CFJ on the following sentence. Murphy cast
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I vote PRESENT in the Anarchist election. (This is effective
28 matches
Mail list logo
