On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Plain text and ASCII are not necessarily the same thing.
You're probably right. Although quoted-printable actually makes my
eyes bleed a lot more than multipart text/html messages :/
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:30, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:19, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Support, to initiate an election for Registrar, since
very soon it will be impossible to publish eir report without Making
My Eyes Bleed.
You are required to include information sufficient to identify and
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 00:19 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Maybe this is not applicable, but in the past I have announced an
intent to deregister a player before 3 months had passes and then
resolved the action after 3 months had passed.
Oh dear; did such actions succeed? Which players were
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 01:48 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Well if you said I intend, without objection, to make the next
proposal I submit distributable you would be unambiguously referring
to exactly one proposal.
There's precedent from the aftermath of proposal 5707, but it ruled that
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 08:55 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, with Support, to initiate an election for Registrar, since
very soon it will be impossible to publish eir report without Making
My Eyes Bleed.
See the solution I used in the Notary's Report.
--
ais523
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 00:32 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Yally wrote:
CoE: Billy Pilgrim and root are not players.
Admitted, they lost their props upon deregistration.
I intend, without objection, to destroy all props owned by the
Lost and Found Department.
I object. Transferring them to
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 23:49 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Parties to 3-Scroll Rodne
ais523
allispaul
BobTHJ
coppro
comex
c-walker
OscarMeyr
Pavitra
Quazie
Tiger
I raise an equity case regarding 3-Scroll Rodney, in that I accidentally
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 19:27 +0100, C-walker wrote:
16th: Coppro discusses new criminal justice system.
G. protos the return of CFJ dismissal.
Ais523 supposedly acts on behalf of myndzi to register em.
It was my idea (sorry), but pikhq got there first.
--
ais523
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Oh dear; did such actions succeed? Which players were they? If any such
players have since tried to take actions without resolving their
registration status first, we might have issues. (Hopefully, though,
that's unlikely.)
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:44 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
I intend, with Support, to initiate an election for Registrar, since
very soon it will be impossible to publish eir report without Making
My Eyes
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 12:26 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Notary List of Contracts 20 Jun 09
The Notary has a weekly duty of tracking various switches, too. This
means that two different rules require me to publish a list of public
contracts (a requirement to publish a list of
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 12:37 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Well, publishing a description of the Notary's report is not an
official part of the report and I don't have very much space to
squeeze all that in there, so, do you have an alternative to List of
Contracts?
Contract Switches might
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I publish an NoV alleging that Quazie violated Rule 2247, a power-1
rule, by failing to perform eir duties as Janitor during the Agoran
week beginning on 15 June.
I
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't we just removed the silly plain text requirement?
Because we want the archives to be usable.
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 13:35 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why don't we just removed the silly plain text requirement?
Because we want the archives to be usable.
I have issues even editing various player's emails
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
An officer should generally have a positive duty to resign or delegate if e
knows
e can't do eir duty for a while. -G.
I agree in principle, but e was already punished with a Rest for
failure to do eir duties before e
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
An officer should generally have a positive duty to resign or delegate if e
knows
e can't do eir duty for a while. -G.
I agree in principle, but e was already punished with
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
MINISTERS WITHOUT PORTFOLIO
comex27-Feb-09 - Speaker
OscarMeyr24-Mar-09
ais5236-Apr-09
coppro3-May-09
Wooble
I have in my email archive issues from the AWJ dated after March 2007,
which is the latest one available from Murphy's site.
2009/6/22 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Plain text and ASCII are not necessarily the same thing.
You're probably right. Although quoted-printable actually makes my
eyes bleed a lot more than multipart text/html
Kerim Aydin wrote:
6355 D 1 2.0 Yally Eliminate Annoying Judge Requirements
AGAINST. Platonism bad.
I don't think this has the usual problems of platonism. For reference:
Proposal 6355 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Yally
Eliminate Annoying Judge Requirements
Amend the
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Unofficial list of significant ambiguities in the gamestate
Date of this not-report: Sun 21 Jun 09
Date of last not-report: Sat 6 Jun 09
This is useful enough, and presumably enough effort, to warrant making
into an official, paid office.
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Unofficial list of significant ambiguities in the gamestate
Date of this not-report: Sun 21 Jun 09
Date of last not-report: Sat 6 Jun 09
This is useful enough, and presumably enough effort, to warrant making
ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 00:32 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Yally wrote:
CoE: Billy Pilgrim and root are not players.
Admitted, they lost their props upon deregistration.
I intend, without objection, to destroy all props owned by the
Lost and Found Department.
I object.
Sgeo wrote:
I have in my email archive issues from the AWJ dated after March 2007,
which is the latest one available from Murphy's site.
Look more carefully; the years appear newest first, but the journals
within each year appear oldest-first. (Perhaps I'll reverse the order
of the years,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I object. Transferring them to players without objection would be a lot
more interesting; a sort of way to collectively and harmlessly award
players for good work, rather than have to transfer props from oneself.
NttPF.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
We should bring back Boons: a Boon for meritorious action of [N notes or
new currency] may be given to a player by a judge finding that the action
is deserving, with Agoran Consent. [This can be done by proposal now, this
makes it a formal process so more likely to be
Sean Hunt wrote:
For each Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal on which Pavitra has not
yet voted, I act on eir behalf to have em endorse me in that decision.
I think I've voted on all such decisions already. Also, how are you
authorized to do that?
Sean Hunt wrote:
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
For each Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal on which Pavitra has not
yet voted, I act on eir behalf to have em endorse me in that decision.
I think I've voted on all such decisions already. Also, how are you
authorized to do that?
Sean Hunt wrote:
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
For each Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal on which Pavitra has not
yet voted, I act on eir behalf to have em endorse me in that decision.
I think I've voted on all such decisions already. Also, how are you
authorized to do that?
Ed Murphy wrote:
Guesses for June 15-21 Proposals CFJs
I intend, without objection from any party to The Cookie Jar, to amend
The Cookie Jar by adding a paragraph:
6) Any party to this contract CAN leave it by announcement.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
For each Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal on which Pavitra has not
yet voted, I act on eir behalf to have em endorse me in that decision.
For each Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal on which c-walker has not
yet voted, I
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Warrigalihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/18 Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com:
I act on behalf of ə to intend, with Agoran Consent, to register.
Gee, I should have done this
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I resolve the Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Anarchist office.
The votes are as follows:
allispaul (6): allispaul, G., Pavitra[1], Tiger, Wooble[2], Yally
C-walker (1): C-walker
Tiger (2): coppro[3],
35 matches
Mail list logo
