On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Try sending these to yourself :)
Did that for a while; just making sure there wasn't anything with
the headers that agoranomic didn't like. -G.
Sean Hunt wrote:
[This message is to test if SCHWA is handled correctly on the lists.
It doesn't actually have a blue ribbon.]
Erk, forgot to change to discussion, not official. Sorry.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Murphy ROGCBK MUVIY 11
How much would Murphy be willing to give me in order for me to name em
as my mentor?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 13:34, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: The ruleset seems shorter than usual.
Based on the above, I am the winner there are no rules.
No, seriously, sorry about that. agora.qoid.us has been moved to
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
At 19:58 Thu 9 July 2009 UTC, comex wrote:
I CoE this one too, just in case. (The SLR should be non-empty.)
What are you talking about? There's plenty of rules there I can
read them all.
comex wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Does it have to be exactly one /natural person/? Or can the vote
collector be the IADoP?
The IADoP is a natural person (or
Sean Hunt wrote:
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal 6397 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=0) by Pavitra
Support Diplomacy
AGAINST, this defeats the purpose of the rule in the first place.
Not really. The purpose of the rule in the first place is to prevent
arbitrary creation of
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com
wrote:
The term IADoP /can/ refer to the officer, yes, but it /also/ can
refer to the office.
I refer to my earlier statement: We assign powers and
responsibilities
to offices all the time. Do
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Murphy ROGCBK MUVIY 11
How much would Murphy be willing to give me in order for me to name em
as my mentor?
What
Sgeo wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Murphy ROGCBK MUVIY 11
How much would Murphy be willing to give me in order for me to name em
as my
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
What I would like, of course, is all the assets you can possibly give
me. I doubt that that's happening though.
I'd like a squadron of tanks. Try again, Friend Citizen.
I think he wants you to make the first offer. ;)
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I refer to my earlier statement: We assign powers and responsibilities
to offices all the time. Do you disagree with that statement? Do you
think that no power or responsibility is ever assigned to an office
itself, but only ever to the officer? If
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
At 19:58 Thu 9 July 2009 UTC, comex wrote:
I CoE this one too, just in case. (The SLR should be non-empty.)
What are you talking about? There's plenty of rules there I can
read them
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I leave the Cookie Jar.
I can't let you do that, Dave.
14 matches
Mail list logo
