On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 22:19, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
[BobTHJ and coppro, your opinion on this sequence and logic is very welcome]
[Also, this is a little odd at bootup, but I think more normal afterwards]
The list of champion awards since March 1 (eldest to youngest) is as
Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/7/16 Taral tar...@gmail.com:
In an Equitable sense, I believe it actually does. If you both entered
into the contract without any intention that it have any effect on
you, it may not even be a contract.
Oh, we knew it'd have effects; we just didn't care because we
comex wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I agree with c. here; rule changes have a special standard and absolute
and precise specification is required. �I screwed up. �-G.
On my part, I apologize that I have to leave in the middle of what
looks
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 00:40, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Thinking about how to automate this is giving me a headache. Your
logic seems sound however (apart from coppro's addition)
BobTHJ
The good news is that you don't have to.
No reallyit's a good kind of
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:02, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I agree with c. here; rule changes have a special standard and absolute
and precise specification is required. �I screwed
Roger Hicks wrote:
Soanyone want to fix this? If this judgment stands all current
deals are in error since the cards and decks do not exist.
BobTHJ
Why is that? Defining cards isn't secured as far as I see.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:59, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Soanyone want to fix this? If this judgment stands all current
deals are in error since the cards and decks do not exist.
BobTHJ
Why is that? Defining cards isn't secured as far as I see.
All the rules
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:59, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Soanyone want to fix this? If this judgment stands all current
deals are in error since the cards and decks do not exist.
BobTHJ
Why is that? Defining cards isn't secured as far as I
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:08, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:59, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Soanyone want to fix this? If this judgment stands all current
deals are in error since the cards and decks do not exist.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 00:40, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Thinking about how to automate this is giving me a headache. Your
logic seems sound however (apart from coppro's addition)
BobTHJ
The
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
comex clearly believes these rules do not exist at all based on eir
judgment. So which is it? If these rules exist at power=1 (preferable
in my opinion) then someone else should support my appeal so more
appropriate
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
So you didn't intend anything *specific*, but you did intend that
*something* would happen.
I for one intended to be bound by whatever the text said.
--
-c.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 06:23, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Didn't nomicron basically die because they were waiting for you to
automate the entire game? And didn't A Nomic and 2 eras of B Nomic
die by relying on one player's recordkeeping?
Sssshhh.you're disrupting the nice
I'd like to see the EUDI (http://eudi.forumotion.net/) flipped to
Neutral. They're not *primarily* a nomic -- they're a player guild in an
online game I play -- but they have a formal charter that provides for
self-amendment, and I think it would be cool (and help spread awareness
of Agora and of
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Though c.'s intent (in my reading)
scans not in iambs of pent
Still coppro's verse deserves no worse
than Bard, I support eir intent.
I don't see how it doesn't. On the other hand, readING?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 17, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I withdraw my previous comments arguing for power=2, and request an
appeals judgment of REMAND.
No remand please
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see how it doesn't. On the other hand, readING? Seriously? :)
Maybe it's reading the ellipsis as a pause that's throwing me off.
Except the second line gives me problems too.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I deputize for the Anarchist to deal cards from the deck of Change as
a result of these proposals. Dealings to follow in automated e-mail.
AFAICT, we have an Anarchist and e hasn't missed the deadline for these.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 13:33, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I deputize for the Anarchist to deal cards from the deck of Change as
a result of these proposals. Dealings to follow in automated e-mail.
AFAICT, we
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
For each proposal currently in the Proposal Pool, I intend, without 3
objections, to distribute it.
There were some pretty bad and obviously unfinished proposals in this
pool. Is a third person willing to object to this? -G.
Deck of Change Report
CARDS IN HAND
-
ais523
Committee x4
Distrib-u-Matic x6
Presto!
allispaul
Distrib-u-Matic x2
Ben Daniel
Committee x2
BobTHJ
Distrib-u-Matic x5
Your Turn
c.
Committee x2
Distrib-u-Matic x2
coppro
Distrib-u-Matic x3
Your Turn
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
Deck of Change Report
CARDS IN HAND
-
I've lost track; are these cards that *have* been dealt, or
that *will* be dealt upon some deputisation time limit ending?
-G.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 14:34, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
Deck of Change Report
CARDS IN HAND
-
I've lost track; are these cards that *have* been dealt, or
that *will* be dealt upon some deputisation time limit ending?
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 15:12, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
All activity related to cards since their inception is available for
perusal at my web-interface: http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx
It is still rather rough at the moment. Changes to account for ehird's
suggestions as
2009/7/17 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
I didn't
mess with the font-size (as ehird suggested) but the text-only version
should compensate for this.
Why not just... get the non-text one right?
Wooble wrote:
I guess 6 proposals, 9 CFJs
Invalid, guesses must now be in by the end of Friday (UTC).
26 matches
Mail list logo
