That single draw for ais523 from the Deck of Justice was sent to test
an automation feature. Remaining draws will be coming shortly.
Ignore the act on behalf disclaimer, I don't need contractual
permission to act on my own behalf (at least I don't think I do).
BobTHJ
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 13:08, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without 3 objections, to flip the contestmaster of the AAA to
BobTHJ.
If you resolve this I'm all set to process SoA actions.
Thanks,
BobTHJ
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 22:45, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
2009/7/17 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
I didn't mess with the font-size (as ehird suggested) but the text-only
version should compensate for this.
Nice site; thanks much. Feature request: can you add a section at
2009/7/21 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
Each first-class player has been given a login to the web interface
control panel located at http://nomic.bob-space.com/controlpanel.aspx.
CoE: no.
2009/7/21 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
2009/7/21 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
Each first-class player has been given a login to the web interface
control panel located at http://nomic.bob-space.com/controlpanel.aspx.
CoE: no.
Oh, wait.
[[To log in to the interface, your
2009/7/21 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
2009/7/21 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
2009/7/21 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
Each first-class player has been given a login to the web interface
control panel located at http://nomic.bob-space.com/controlpanel.aspx.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
And, as it turns out, CoE: no anyway. I can't log in; maybe Wooble
changed my password.
I just found out about the existence of the logins now, and my
password doesn't work either (also, the forgot password page
2009/7/21 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
I just found out about the existence of the logins now, and my
password doesn't work either (also, the forgot password page throws
an exception.)
But thanks for the accusation.
I will refrain from joking in the future.
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
However, I did make the
assumption that Agorans were a mature enough lot not to try petty
things like that. I doubt any actions taken on their behalf by an
imposter would hold up under CFJ anyway.
When I was working on my proto-version of this (happy
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 09:55, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
However, I did make the
assumption that Agorans were a mature enough lot not to try petty
things like that. I doubt any actions taken on their behalf by an
imposter would hold up
FYI, I've modified future card draws made by dealors through the web
interface to be pragmatic. However, any draws which have already been
earned as of this point will be sent platonically if sent from the web
interface (such as the ones I just sent from the Deck of Justice)
because they are
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
FYI, I've modified future card draws made by dealors through the web
interface to be pragmatic. However, any draws which have already been
earned as of this point will be sent platonically if sent from the web
interface (such as the ones I just sent
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:32, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
FYI, I've modified future card draws made by dealors through the web
interface to be pragmatic. However, any draws which have already been
earned as of this point will be sent
G. wrote:
I submit the following proposal, fix ancient cards, AI-2, II-0.
Rule 2260 (The Deck of Government) by replacing Vote Power with
voting limit where it appears in the rule.
You might need an 'Amend' there.
--
C-walker
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I intend to make it distributable without objection.
You can still do it by announcement, and there's probably not much
point in saving your announcement since the rule allowing it can now
be repealed by announcement.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I spend a Distrib-u-Matic card to make Fix Veto distributable.
I believe I had an outstanding intent to make this distributable
without objection which was not objected to. I really should mark
these things because I seem
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I intend to make it distributable without objection.
You can still do it by announcement, and there's probably not much
point in saving your announcement since the rule
Ranking all the winners recently gave me an idea for replacing the
Poobah and Castes. (1) is there support for this idea; (2) logicians
and mathematicians, please help find holes in the first Rule:
does the rule suitably imply sensible common-sense definitions of
a ranking list? E.g. forbids
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, G. wrote:
(1) is there support for this idea
I support it as it seems to work better than castes and I like the
ideas of making ordinary voting more cutthroat and linking in the
speaker. I'm not sure, however, if this is different enough from the
current system
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:18 +0100, C-walker wrote:
7. Initialization is based on list of Champions (previously
published); non-champions are put on list in registration
order.
This is generally a good idea, but maybe non-Champions could be placed
higher in the initial list for
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, C-walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, G. wrote:
(1) is there support for this idea
I support it as it seems to work better than castes and I like the
ideas of making ordinary voting more cutthroat and linking in the
speaker. I'm not sure, however, if this is
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 13:18, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Allowing 'empty places' on the list could make things more
interesting: maybe players could automatically rise to the top of
pockets of empty places in the list?
OooI like the idea of empty spots on the list.
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:18 +0100, C-walker wrote:
7. Initialization is based on list of Champions (previously
published); non-champions are put on list in registration
order.
This is generally a good idea, but maybe non-Champions could be placed
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 13:18, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Allowing 'empty places' on the list could make things more
interesting: maybe players could automatically rise to the top of
pockets of empty places in the list?
OooI
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:32 PM, G. wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, C-walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, G. wrote:
3. Some form of monthly rotation.
Again, this is not much different from the current system. Have you
any specific ideas for a different form of monthly rotation?
I still don't understand this scam.
coppro argued that:
it is IMPOSSIBLE to send a public message except where allowed
by the rules.
because of the equivalence of acting on behalf of oneself and just
general acting by sending a public message.
But R478 authorizes just that sort of action,
Players who are members of the Bob's Janitorial Service may now deal
themselves cards via the web interface (located at
http://nomic.bob-space.com/controlpanel.aspx). Presently such deals
may only come from the Deck of Justice, but if the Poobah and
Anarchist join BJS you will be able to deal from
27 matches
Mail list logo
