DIS: Re: BUS: Fwd: Bridge

2010-08-17 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/17/2010 05:59 PM, omd wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: comex Date: Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:13 PM Subject: Bridge To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org I push the Heavy Laser Cannon button harder. Note: Per the headers, this message left omd's domain of control one second

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6790-6810

2010-08-17 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/17/2010 02:24 PM, ais523 wrote: 6794 P 0 1.0 coppro Restore White Conditional: AGAINST if proposal 6794 passes/would pass, FOR otherwise Uh... If you meant 6795, it should be totally ineffective if 6795 does pass, as White Ribbons won't be defined and will cease to exist/f

DIS: Re: BUS: [Enemy] Journey

2010-08-17 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
On 17 August 2010 22:21, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > Having given Notice, I initiate a Journey. > > The map is: > > @>--@ > > --Enemy Wooble > This causes all previous threats to be destroyed, and all active players to be drafted to the Bridge. Quick guide for players who haven't cared before

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Distribution

2010-08-17 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 19:25, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I pay fees to make every Undistributable proposal in the Proposal Pool >> distributable, then I withdraw The Robot and submit and identical proposal >> and pay a fee to make it Distributabl

DIS: Re: BUS: Distribution

2010-08-17 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 19:25, Sean Hunt wrote: > I pay fees to make every Undistributable proposal in the Proposal Pool > distributable, then I withdraw The Robot and submit and identical proposal > and pay a fee to make it Distributable (so that it gets distributed in the > same batch as Super R

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6790-6810

2010-08-17 Thread ais523
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:10 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I change my chamber to Purple. > > I assume this is close enough to changing eir Title that it's effective? We've been through this before. (Did nobody read the disputed section of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6790-6810

2010-08-17 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > > I assume this is close enough to changing eir Title that it's effective? > > Err, nevermind. I know, I had to look too, that's an awkwardly-written rule.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6790-6810

2010-08-17 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I assume this is close enough to changing eir Title that it's effective? Err, nevermind.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6790-6810

2010-08-17 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I change my chamber to Purple. I assume this is close enough to changing eir Title that it's effective?

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6790-6810

2010-08-17 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:25 AM, ais523 wrote: > Didn't coppro make my Pariah proposal Distributable (thus requiring it > to be in a distribution this week)? Unless I'm missing a message, it was only made distributable at the start of this week, along with everything else in the pool.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6790-6810

2010-08-17 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Keba wrote: > Sean Hunt wrote: >> >> > 6805 G 1 1.0 Keba                Props should be important! >> This decision doesn't exist, but ENDORSE the Captain just in case > > Why does this decision not exist? ais523 had payed a fee to make it > distributable? For som

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6790-6810

2010-08-17 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:08 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > This distribution of proposals 6790-6810 > initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible > voters are the active players at the time of this distribution, and > the vote collector is the Assessor. The valid options

Re: DIS: To repair listlessness v0.2

2010-08-17 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 17:20 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: > > This leads to another question: Does "Win by Clout" really need to be > > repealed? > > I'd say so. The odds of it being triggered are practically nil except in > the event of a scam (actually, that's basically the case right now too). > It