On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> The second is that it is impossible to publish the List of Succession, as it
> would only be a copy.
>
> Therefore, the alleged List of Succession report in the aforementioned week
> was not actually a publication of the List of Succession, and thus a fail
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:09 PM, omd wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
>> On 09/17/2010 01:05 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Gratuitous: The interpretation suggested by the caller is absurd.
>>
>> Would you prefer the interpretation that the list published in the
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 09/17/2010 01:05 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Gratuitous: The interpretation suggested by the caller is absurd.
>
> Would you prefer the interpretation that the list published in the message
> was rearranged to match the List of Successio
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 09/17/2010 03:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Warrigal wrote:
> > > Conclusion: List-of-Succession-like things are a huge headache. Let's
> > > go back to VLOPs.
> >
> > It's trivial. I deputize for the Herald to publish th
On 09/17/2010 03:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Warrigal wrote:
Conclusion: List-of-Succession-like things are a huge headache. Let's
go back to VLOPs.
It's trivial. I deputize for the Herald to publish the following
LIST OF SUCCESSION report
Order Influence No Declarati
On 09/17/2010 01:05 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote:
Gratuitous: The interpretation suggested by the caller is absurd.
Would you prefer the interpretation that the list published in the
message was rearranged to match the List of Succession.
-coppro
On Sep 17, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> Conclusion: List-of-Succession-like things are a huge headache. Let's
> go back to VLOPs.
FAILING GRADE
Conclusion: List-of-Succession-like things are a huge headache. Let's
go back to VLOPs.
—Tanner L. Swett
Gratuitous: The interpretation suggested by the caller is absurd.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 17, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I publish an NoV alleging that Keba violated Rule 2143 and committed the
> Class-2 Crime of Tardiness by failing to publish the List of Succession in
> the we
Gratuitous: In that case, the clause about ambiguity of the List of Succession
is useless.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I CFJ on the following statement: A document purporting to be a judicial
> declaration
> is only a judicial declaration if m
On 09/17/2010 12:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
2010/9/17 Sean Hunt:
Proto: invade BN.
This would involve remembering to visit their website.
You could subscribe to the feed.
-coppro
2010/9/17 Sean Hunt :
> Proto: invade BN.
This would involve remembering to visit their website.
Proto: invade BN.
-coppro
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> and I doubt enough people would be interested anyway.
>
> I intend, with notice and with 3 support, to cause Space Alert to
> cease to be a contest.
>
> Sorry for the bother.
>
I support. (I planned to do so as well anyway)
--
Keba
Am Freitag, den 17.09.2010, 10:13 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Keba wrote:
> > An invasion consisting of one player? (Or miss I someone?) Did I do
> > anything wrong to deal me out?
>
> One player? Blognomic's Riddler took direct action to make you the
> Speak
Wooble wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Keba wrote:
>> An invasion consisting of one player? (Or miss I someone?) Did I do
>> anything wrong to deal me out?
>
> One player? Blognomic's Riddler took direct action to make you the
> Speaker; this conspiracy touches the highest levels of b
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Keba wrote:
> An invasion consisting of one player? (Or miss I someone?) Did I do
> anything wrong to deal me out?
One player? Blognomic's Riddler took direct action to make you the
Speaker; this conspiracy touches the highest levels of both BN and
Agora. And ce
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> If I haven't voted yet, I vote AGAINST each proposal from 6834-6841;
> without a recent referee's report I can't be bothered to figure out
> who's on my team, and I'm not voting FOR an interested proposal by a
> non-team-member as a protest against our Honored Speaker messin
Am Sonntag, den 12.09.2010, 22:16 +0200 schrieb Keba:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > 6837 0 1.0 KebaLeet fix
>
> CoE: I have withdrawn this Proposal on or about 05/09/2010 10:58:09 (and
> submitted a similar proposal entitled "Leet fix fix"), so this proposal
> cannot be distributed.
Am Donnerstag, den 16.09.2010, 20:07 -0400 schrieb comex:
> Proposal: individualism (AI=2, II=0, Distributable)
>
> Repeal Rule 2303 (Teams), Rule 2304 (The Referee), Rule 2305 (Fans),
> and Rule 2306 (Team Tactics).
II=0?
--
Keba
20 matches
Mail list logo
