On 09/24/2010 09:01 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Taral wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
At the end of each week, if the number of Rests (R) in the current
Pariah's possession that were destroyed during that week [and
while e was Pariah] [and since e most rece
Taral wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> At the end of each week, if the number of Rests (R) in the current
>> Pariah's possession that were destroyed during that week [and
>> while e was Pariah] [and since e most recently became Pariah] is
>> greate
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> At the end of each week, if the number of Rests (R) in the current
> Pariah's possession that were destroyed during that week [and
> while e was Pariah] [and since e most recently became Pariah] is
> greater than 6, then e gai
Proto-Proposal: All pariahs are equally dirty
Amend Rule 2312 (The Pariah) by replacing this text:
that player is awarded 23 Rests.
with this text:
if e has a number of Rests (R) less than 23, then e gains
23-R Rests.
Proto-Proposal: Clarify re-dirtying
Amend Rule 2312 (Th
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, omd wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:05 PM, ais523 wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, rule 754 allows the Rulekeepor to do this
>> unilaterally anyway, or even to revert the change immediately after it's
>> made.
>
> Not now that "except for the purpose of reportin
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:05 PM, ais523 wrote:
> As far as I can tell, rule 754 allows the Rulekeepor to do this
> unilaterally anyway, or even to revert the change immediately after it's
> made.
Not now that "except for the purpose of reporting on or quoting the
text of a legal document" has bee
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 13:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Tanner L. Swett wrote:
>
> > I submit a proposal, titled "Spelling reform begins with Agora", with
> > AI = 1.0 and II = 1, and make it distributable by fee:
> >
> > {In all rules, replace all instances of the string "judge" (and the
> > strin
Tanner L. Swett wrote:
> I submit a proposal, titled "Spelling reform begins with Agora", with
> AI = 1.0 and II = 1, and make it distributable by fee:
>
> {In all rules, replace all instances of the string "judge" (and the
> string "judg" where it is not followed by an "e") with the string
> "ju
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 00:05 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > I support the intent to appeal CFJ 2867. (It now has sufficient
> > support regardless of how Sgeo's conditional support is judged.)
>
> With 2 support, I appeal CFJ 2867.
I'm not going to bother to ca
Taral wrote:
> Can the record show prejudice somehow?
It's mostly been mentioned along with arguments. I would add a note
if someone just opined "REMAND with prejudice" or similar.
On 09/24/2010 02:45 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
It's already meaningless. Voting limits are locked at the end of the
voting period.
Not for ordinary decisions (the only ones where voting limits
routinely change). Rule 2156, excerpt:
11 matches
Mail list logo
