On 10-10-24 11:54 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I transfer a kudo from Wooble (for the delay) to G. (for reminding me
of the shorter voting period, which I would otherwise have botched).
prop?
-coppro
omd wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> NUM Â C I AI Â SUBMITTER Â Â Â Â Â TITLE
>> 6863 O 1 2.0 coppro        Be Exact
> AGAINST
>> 6864 O 1 3.0 coppro        Urgency simplified
> FOR
>> 6865 O 1 2.0 G. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â List
omd wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:18 AM, ais523
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 00:03 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> = Appeal 1631a (Interest Index = 0) ==
>>
>> The caller has provided no argument why the verdict in question is
>> necessarily incorrect, so
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2892
>
> === CFJ 2892 (Interest Index = 2)
>
> Due to Rule 2215, it is illegal for any current player who has
> read Rule 2215 to make an unqua
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:18 AM, ais523 wrote:
> The caller has provided no argument why the verdict in question is
> necessarily incorrect, so AFFIRM seems appropriate here. Thinking about
> it, I'm going to violate a SHOULD and opine AFFIRM WITH PREJUDICE, and
> hope that other judges do likewis
5 matches
Mail list logo
