Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6928 - 6940

2011-02-14 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Per omd's request: > > NttPF Intentional, as (a) self-ratification may have mooted it anyway and (b) the rest of the information could do with spot-checking.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6928 - 6940

2011-02-14 Thread omd
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Per omd's request: NttPF

Re: DIS: Assessor catchup

2011-02-14 Thread Ed Murphy
scshunt wrote: >>* G.'s second scam attempt >>- made all other players inactive > deregistered >>- submitted a Proposal dubbed 6959 >>- assumed Promotor >>- distributed Proposal 6959 >>- resigned Promotor >>- made players active and offices postu

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6928 - 6940

2011-02-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Per omd's request: I wrote: > Voting results for Proposals 6928 - 6940: > > [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the > following proposals. For each decision, the options available to > Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).] > > x6928 O0 3.0

Re: DIS: Assessor catchup

2011-02-14 Thread Sean Hunt
On 11-02-14 04:58 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: Here are my informal notes for getting Assessor caught up. Please let me know if you spot any problems. * Per CFJ 2941, my change to the List of Succession near the end of the holiday failed for lack of ergs, so Proposal 6943 passed. * Yally wa

DIS: Assessor catchup

2011-02-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Here are my informal notes for getting Assessor caught up. Please let me know if you spot any problems. * Per CFJ 2941, my change to the List of Succession near the end of the holiday failed for lack of ergs, so Proposal 6943 passed. * Yally was already Pariah as of January 10, so eir el

Re: DIS: well then...second draft

2011-02-14 Thread Sean Hunt
On 11-02-14 03:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: [Draft of President part only.] Proto: add an Admiral

DIS: well then...second draft

2011-02-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
[Draft of President part only.] Create a power-2 Rule entitled "The President": The President is a second-class person. The President CAN only take actions as explicitly described/caused by a Rule or other instrument of a power equal to or greater than the power of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: well then...

2011-02-14 Thread Ed Murphy
scshunt wrote: > On 11-02-14 01:37 PM, omd wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> Create a power-2 Rule entitled "The President": >>> >>> The President is a second-class person and a player. A >>> first-class player CAN cause the President to take an actio

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: well then...

2011-02-14 Thread Sean Hunt
On 11-02-14 01:37 PM, omd wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: Create a power-2 Rule entitled "The President": The President is a second-class person and a player. A first-class player CAN cause the President to take an action other than deregistration

DIS: Re: BUS: well then...

2011-02-14 Thread omd
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Create a power-2 Rule entitled "The President": > >      The President is a second-class person and a player.  A >      first-class player CAN cause the President to take an action >      other than deregistration by using a mechanism explicit

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: well then...

2011-02-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, ais523 wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 10:53 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > > I was referring to the "by announcement" comment; sanitizing illegal > > actions is fine if it's done with Agoran Consent, IMO. Having a second > > class player that can be made to do things by annou

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: well then...

2011-02-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Sean Hunt > >> wrote: > >> > On 11-02-13 11:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Create a power-2 Rule en

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: well then...

2011-02-14 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 10:53 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I was referring to the "by announcement" comment; sanitizing illegal > actions is fine if it's done with Agoran Consent, IMO. Having a second > class player that can be made to do things by announcement is a bad > idea, though. IMO, the AF

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: well then...

2011-02-14 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Sean Hunt >> wrote: >> > On 11-02-13 11:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> >> Create a power-2 Rule entitled "The President": >> >> >> >>       The Preside

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: well then...

2011-02-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: > > On 11-02-13 11:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> > >> Create a power-2 Rule entitled "The President": > >> > >>       The President is a second-class person and a player.  A > >>       first-clas

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: well then...

2011-02-14 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 11-02-13 11:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> Create a power-2 Rule entitled "The President": >> >>       The President is a second-class person and a player.  A >>       first-class player CAN cause the President to take an action >>       oth