DIS: Re: BUS: Intentions and NoVs

2011-03-29 Thread Ed Murphy
Walker wrote: > I publish a NoV accusing Wooble of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule, > by failing to judge case 2979 within the time limit. > I publish a NoV accusing omd of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule, by > failing to judge case 2980 within the time limit. > > I call for judgement on bo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intentions and NoVs

2011-03-29 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Which > is fine; Contested NoVs are considered "on hold" unless someone raises > another court case about them. ...and uncontested NoVs do nothing at all at the moment.

DIS: Re: BUS: Intentions and NoVs

2011-03-29 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Charles Walker wrote: > On 29 March 2011 20:29, Charles Walker wrote: > > I publish a NoV accusing Wooble of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule, > > by failing to judge case 2979 within the time limit. > > I publish a NoV accusing omd of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule, b