On 9 January 2012 23:59, Ben Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
Gratuitous counter argument, possibly erroneous:
I seem to recall that Agoran precedent allows non-players to submit CFJs
without affecting their player (or non-player) status.
OscarMeyr
I think this is not so much
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
7145 2 omd A controversial proposal
AGAINST (I think you meant unambiguous there at the end?)
The intent expressed in such a message is necessarily ambiguous, but
required to be unambiguous.
I state my support for southpointingchariot to support ais523 to hold this
position. I don't, however, support ais523.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 22:34, southpointingchariot
southpointingchariot.no...@gmail.com wrote:
I state my support for ais523 to hold this position.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at
3 matches
Mail list logo
