On 08/13/2012 10:33 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
FKA441344 wrote:
I submit a proposal with title {No Zero Length Reports}, adoption
index 3, and text
Create a new rule with title No News Is Some News and this text:
If the rules define a report as including a list, then while that
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
The rest of this rule notwithstanding, a promise CANNOT be cashed,
directly or indirectly, as a part of the outcome of cashing that same
promise.
What would this solve? The promise's text could include
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
CFJ: { I can cash a promise named A Million Bucks. }
For completeness, since this is phrased like a turtle, any reason you
think this should be UNDECIDABLE as opposed to UNDETERMINED?
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, omd wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
The rest of this rule notwithstanding, a promise CANNOT be cashed,
directly or indirectly, as a part of the outcome of cashing that same
promise.
What would this solve?
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 09:56 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
That's why I didn't propose a fix when ais523 and I tried this. I
think the solutions that work are:
(1) Forbidding any promise from cashing any other promise (breaks
basic functionality of allowing promises to be general currencies,
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 15:04 -0700, omd wrote:
Proposal: Lost and Found (AI=2)
Amend Rule 2166 (Assets) by replacing:
any player CAN transfer or destroy it without objection.
with:
any player CAN transfer it to emself by announcement.
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Why?
Because it's silly.
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 15:20 -0700, omd wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Why?
Because it's silly.
At least the FINE section was to make it possible to fine people assets
that they couldn't destroy but could transfer (as, for instance, might
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, omd wrote:
any player CAN transfer it to emself by announcement.
[snip]
either destroy this amount of eir asset or transfer it to the
Lost and Found Department.
with:
destroy that amount of eir asset.
Aw, I wanted to play with Free Parking.
H. Ambassador-At-Large ais523, it has come to my attention (because I
planned it) that someone has falsely claimed to a nomic (that I
started ten minutes ago) to be an ambassador of Agora. (Although the
nomic's rules[1] do not attempt to define how to contact it, since
such a definition might not
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:04 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
H. Ambassador-At-Large ais523, it has come to my attention (because I
planned it) that someone has falsely claimed to a nomic (that I
started ten minutes ago) to be an ambassador of Agora. (Although the
nomic's rules[1] do not
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:59 -0700, omd wrote:
Clarification: I forgot to state that the person who made the false
claim is the other player of Existential Nomic, so e's also the one
that has to be informed.
This message contains the ISIDTID fallacy…
--
ais523
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 05:06 +0100, ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:59 -0700, omd wrote:
Clarification: I forgot to state that the person who made the false
claim is the other player of Existential Nomic, so e's also the one
that has to be informed.
This message contains the
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:12 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Actually, thinking about this, I think it's impossible under the current
rules for anyone to inform a nomic (including Agora) of anything,
because the rules don't define a mechanism for doing so, and nomics are
legal
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 22:41 -0700, omd wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:12 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Actually, thinking about this, I think it's impossible under the current
rules for anyone to inform a nomic (including Agora) of anything,
because the rules don't define
15 matches
Mail list logo
