On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I become active.
[The rest of this message is an attempt to scam a loophole in the
recently passed proposal 7324. Also it calls an election, which is
something that probably needed to happen anyway, but also seems like the
I think I agree that rule 754 is useless, except that I think this
part of it is very significant: A difference between two nonempty
spans of whitespace is inconsequential in all forms of communication
for all purposes. Maybe we should amend it to say just that.
—Machiavelli
Gratuitous: By itself, I cause X to send a message with the same text
as Y may be reasonable shorthand, but isn't there some precedent that
we should take the global view and consider the shorthand unreasonable
because it is being used to effectively send an infinitely long
message?
Sorry, right when I took the office I got hit with a huge wave, and I have
been unable to go through the entire backlog. If anybody wants to take over
IADoP, I'd be more than happy to forfeit it. Otherwise, I'll try to get a
report out soon.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Alex Smith
On 01/27/2013 06:48 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
I become active.
I submit a proposal, cleanup, AI 3:
{{{
Repeal rule 754.
}}}
I become inactive.
First off, I promise in the ordinary-language sense that I don't
currently have a scam in mind involving this; I haven't tried to think
of one, and
5 matches
Mail list logo
