On 22 Jul 2013 21:39, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:23 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
[18 proposals]
So what are we really trying to achieve in limiting proposals to MI?
Is it largely just a cash sink, or are we really trying to delay a
potentially large number
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I nominate myself, with a salary of Graham's number G Yaks.
Good luck on recording THAT in the reports.
--
OscarMeyr
I haven't gotten very far into the ruleset, so this proto will
probably grow a bit. (I sure hope it does.)
--
Protoproposal h0140 (AI=2)
Tyop O Increment
I had started writing a Proposal fixing *all* the spelling
errors, thinking I would be the MIGHTY CLEANER of the
I object to this judgement of OVERRULE. I think that since OVERRULE is not
subject to oversight, it should not be used to introduce new opinions, but
rather only to affirm existing opinions (presumably implementing the judgement
suggested by the appellant, or some such), or to effect a
My ruling was based on rule 911, which states, in part:
OVERRULE with a valid replacement judgement for the prior
case, appropriate if the prior judgement was inappropriate in
the prior case and the replacement judgement is appropriate
for the prior case; the
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I object to this judgement of OVERRULE.
Gratuitous: For the record, I think that scshunt's offense is not even
close to the levels of negligence various officers have shown over the
years; although this has largely been
6 matches
Mail list logo
