On 01/08/2013 1:34 PM, omd wrote:
* I also attempt to distribute this with Chamber of each of Green,
Red, and Purple (in that case, the proposal is separately Ordinary).
What's that about? Nice colour scheme though.
On 01/08/2013 1:42 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
7568 30 O omd, etc. Agora pulls a B + some ratifications
Fool, can you please distribute this in your purported gamestate as
well and adopt it?
-scshunt
Duhhh of course. I'll do it right away without looking closely. I mean
it DOES say
On 01/08/2013 1:48 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
it's a delightfully confusing time
You're welcome! :)
On 01/08/2013 10:39 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Jul 29, 2013, at 8:13 PM, Fool wrote:
You're right, intuitionistic logic is too weird.
Heck no. Classical logic is weird.
But classical logic is the system obeyed by truth-bearing statements!
—Of course, who cares about truth-bearing
On 2 August 2013 11:22, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/08/2013 1:34 PM, omd wrote:
* I also attempt to distribute this with Chamber of each of Green,
Red, and Purple (in that case, the proposal is separately Ordinary).
What's that about? Nice colour scheme though.
Thanks, I chose it.
On 01/08/2013 5:03 PM, James Beirne wrote:
FOR*1
I think you need to retract your previous vote first.
On 2 August 2013 11:38, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
It's common enough to hear that classical logic is about truth while
intuitionistic is about provability or something like that, but I don't
buy it.
Classic logic is about irrefutability.
On 2 August 2013 11:26, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
Duhhh of course. I'll do it right away without looking closely. I mean it
DOES say EMEREGENCY... 8*b 8*b 8*b
*sigh*
7568 30 O omd, etc. Agora pulls a B + some ratifications
FOR
--
OscarMeyr
On 2 August 2013 13:46, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
FOR
NtttPF (and please vote as FOR*1 for unambiguity).
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
Davy I may, however, struggle with the requirement to be generally
capable of communicating via email.
I dunno, I hear cats are quite proficient at using keyboards.
On Aug 2, 2013, at 6:38 AM, Fool wrote:
On 01/08/2013 10:39 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
But classical logic is the system obeyed by truth-bearing statements!
—Of course, who cares about truth-bearing statements, anyway Machiavelli
It's common enough to hear that classical logic is about truth
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
I dunno, I hear cats are quite proficient at using keyboards.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
I think you mean sleeping on keyboards.
I fail to see how sleeping on is not using.
The Ambassador-at-Large intends to unofficially deputise for the Envoy
to complete that office's duties, which are to advertise Agora in
appropriate non-Agoran public fora. But first, I thought I'd gather
some opinions and ask questions about related topics.
As part of eir continual stakeholder
as far as advertising for me goes my best methods are on the radio since i
am an internet radio DJ. as far as getting and retaining players the
ruleset has atleast for me proven to be rather wordy and the concept is a
bit confusing the best way is to present a straight forward ruleset for
those
I appeal my own case on the grounds that I HAVE NO FREAKING IDEA WHAT'S
GOING ON despite me being an elder
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 21:25 -0400, Fool wrote:
HER FELINE MAJESTY DAVY I
versus
ais523, arkestra, ehird,
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 02:43 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 3 August 2013 02:32, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement using the mechanism
in rule 911.
I support.
(For anyone who hasn't noticed yet: this is useful in the (quite
plausible)
if this gets my name off that list of guilty then i support it too this is
insane
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3 August 2013 02:32, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement using the
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 21:54 -0400, Max Schutz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3 August 2013 02:32, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement using the mechanism
in rule 911.
I
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
(a) provide an alternate consistent explanation that blocks the
Action and show that (b) it also fits the other logical questions that arise
in Agora and (c) it actually does follow from the rules (including R217 of
course)
20 matches
Mail list logo
