On 5/9/14 at 3:12pm, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi - you're late to judge CFJ 3406. Since you're new, here's a
reminder in case you want to fix this. If not, I'll recuse you in a
few days.
What is the case that I need to judge?
_
LiberonScien
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
7656 scshunt 1 Clairty
AGAINST until precedent is cleared up. increase should be replaced by
simply change if its meant to go both directions.
If the precedent is that you can't increase by a
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
7656 scshunt 1 Clairty
AGAINST until precedent is cleared up. increase should be replaced by
simply change if its meant to go both directions.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:10 AM, x1122334455 x1122334...@writing.com wrote:
What is the case that I need to judge?
Basically, I recommend reading the entire thread DIS: Re: BUS: I
register. If your email client has deleted it or something, it may
be found here:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
7649 scshunt 2 I always thought these already ratifie
AGAINST; this doesn't allow for implicit switches, and so I think it
might cause all the old CFJs to spontaneously unjudge themselves, or
something
On 13 May 2014 17:54, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I vote:
7644 Yally1 Make the Birthday Holiday line up
with
FIR
What's this do?
On 2014-05-13 13:44, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 13 May 2014 17:54, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I vote:
7644 Yally1 Make the Birthday Holiday line up
with
FIR
What's this do?
The FLR has
{{{
[CFJ 1885 (called 26 January 2008): AGAINT is a variant
7 matches
Mail list logo
