On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 02:24 +, Eritivus wrote:
The Promotor failed to publish all such information. In particular,
e did not publish that Wordplay was in the Proposal Pool.
Counterarguments:
The information required is 'a list of all proposals in the Proposal
Pool, along with their text
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Eritivus eriti...@gmail.com wrote:
Counterarguments:
The information required is 'a list of all proposals in the Proposal
Pool, along with their text and attributes', not each individual
fact that list represents, such as 'that Wordplay was in the
Proposal
On 30 October 2014 04:45, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I punch the Bard in the face.
Inside the inn, we find the Bard and some unknown character, whom we
designate AQ. The Bard is singing merrily, and AQ, evidently growing
On 2014-10-30 00:39, Eritivus wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 02:24 +, Eritivus wrote:
The Promotor failed to publish all such information. In particular,
e did not publish that Wordplay was in the Proposal Pool.
Counterarguments:
The information required is 'a list of all proposals in
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 15:25 +, Sprocklem wrote:
E did, however, fail to, as part of eir weekly duties, distribute all
pending proposals, something that the rules say e SHALL do.
omd distributed the only pending proposal, Ribbons 2014. I don't
think this duty could enable deputisation again
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 22:23 -0400, omd wrote:
[...]
7700 1 Henri Office Salary
AGAINST; we've attempted this sort of rule quite a lot, and it's never
been worth the recordkeepor issue
[...]
7702 1 Henri
On 30 October 2014 18:07, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I retract the proposal Restricted distribution. I submit the
following proposal (an edited version):
[...]
I didn't come up with any good solution for the rule about not
changing the attribute of proposals after their
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I retract the proposal Restricted distribution. I submit the
following proposal (an edited version):
Still contains the swich typo. Regarding the attributes thing,
since this proposal is already AI 3,
can't you
As my 'nomic' time budget will be used on CFJ catchup,
I will not post GNP odds for the current week. I expect
to post odds for next week in the neighborhood of Tue-Wed.
-G.
On Oct 30, 2014 1:02 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
If it is that difficult for the recordkeepors, couldn't we just raise
the salary of the recordkeepors in order to compensate for the burden?
Isn't that the purpose of the variable office salary?
Well, we can increase salaries
Oscarosaurus grazes in the farmland near the inn. E tries to determine if
the strange music has a good STOMP beat. (It's hard to enjoy music any
other way when you lack opposable thumbs or nimble ankles.)
[I'm kind of planning to make my character something out of Dinotopia (
On 30 October 2014 19:05, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I retract the proposal Restricted distribution. I submit the
following proposal (an edited version):
Still contains the swich typo. Regarding the
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 30, 2014 1:02 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
If it is that difficult for the recordkeepors, couldn't we just raise
the salary of the recordkeepors in order to compensate for the burden?
Isn't that
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 30, 2014 1:02 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
If it is that difficult for the recordkeepors, couldn't we just raise
the salary of the recordkeepors in order to compensate for the burden?
Isn't that
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 30, 2014 1:02 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
If it is that difficult for the recordkeepors, couldn't we just raise
the salary of the recordkeepors in order to compensate for the burden?
Isn't that
Testing. Are you all getting this message? When I simply reply to
messages I get from the mailing list, my messages don't appear in my
inbox, but when I change the subject of the email and reply, I get my
message, so I'm confused.
-Henri
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing. Are you all getting this message? When I simply reply to
messages I get from the mailing list, my messages don't appear in my
inbox, but when I change the subject of the email and reply, I get my
message, so
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing. Are you all getting this message? When I simply reply to
messages I get from the mailing list, my messages don't appear in my
inbox,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 22:23 -0400, omd wrote:
[...]
7701 1 Henri Credits
AGAINST; broken, amendments cannot be made simultaneously
[...]
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Eritivus eriti...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 06:22 +, Eritivus wrote:
7706 3 omd Fast Track
ENDORSE scshunt
If this was a valid ballot [*], I retract it.
I vote FOR 7706.
[*] It seems scshunt isn't registered?
After a bit of
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
IDAuthor(s) AI Title
7711 omd1.0 Wordplay
PRESENT
7712 Murphy 1.0 Full disclosure
FOR
7713 Warrigal 3.0 Speedliness
FOR
7714
On 2014-10-30 16:55, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
IDAuthor(s) AI Title
7711 omd1.0 Wordplay
PRESENT
7712 Murphy 1.0 Full disclosure
FOR
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Henri Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 22:23 -0400, omd wrote:
[...]
7700 1 Henri Office Salary
AGAINST; we've attempted this sort of rule quite a lot, and it's never
been worth the
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals (with
preliminary IDs):
Though it's of course the Promotor's prerogative to choose when to
distribute, I'm curious why you didn't distribute all of them.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
7711 omd1.0 Wordplay
By the way, it was pointed out that this violates the recently
arguably reestablished custom of installing an officer, so I probably
should have changed it. But in any case, I volunteer to
On Oct 30, 2014, at 3:43 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 30 October 2014 04:45, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I punch the Bard in the face.
Inside the inn, we find the Bard and some unknown character, whom we
designate AQ. The
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, omd wrote:
By the way, it was pointed out that this violates the recently
arguably reestablished custom of installing an officer, so I probably
should have changed it. But in any case, I volunteer to recordkeep
this, and since I'm pretty sure King Azaz cannot even
On Oct 30, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 30, 2014 1:02 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
If it is that difficult for the recordkeepors, couldn't we just raise
the salary of the
On Oct 30, 2014, at 8:55 PM, omd wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
7711 omd1.0 Wordplay
By the way, it was pointed out that this violates the recently
arguably reestablished custom of installing an officer, so I probably
should have changed
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014, Eritivus wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 02:24 +, Eritivus wrote:
CFJ: The Promotor failed to perform a weekly duty during the week of
20 Oct. Deputisation to perform this duty is generally possible,
given sufficient notice as per R2160(c), and given that the duty
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 02:56 +, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Once again, I vaguely remember a past CFJ that asked how much of
a report could be missing and still be a considered a report (with
missing data) versus an entirely missing report.
The gist of my TRUE argument is that R2143 doesn't say
31 matches
Mail list logo
