Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread ais523
On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 12:10 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Other note:  A fair thing to do would be to hold an election.  But  > election for ADoP is resolved by ADoP - a problem!  We actually  > used to have "separation of powers" for this, something that read: > > "In the case that the election is

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Aris Merchant wrote: > Two miss-sends in a row. Sorry. That's embarrassing. > > There's one way it could be, although it seems unlikely and is going > to be dismissed as too fuzzy. It has to do with how wrong something has > to be to not be a report. One could argue that

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread Aris Merchant
Two miss-sends in a row. Sorry. That's embarrassing. There's one way it could be, although it seems unlikely and is going to be dismissed as too fuzzy. It has to do with how wrong something has to be to not be a report. One could argue that there is a fundamental difference between something that

DIS: Re: agora-discussion Digest, Vol 37, Issue 13

2016-10-22 Thread Aris Merchant
Yep. Actually several of them, on Agora-official. Please try not to send the whole digest, it's huge. -Aris

DIS: Re: agora-discussion Digest, Vol 37, Issue 13

2016-10-22 Thread John-Richard Isenhour
> > 7819+ Alexis 1.0 Legislating Convention > > > > > AGAINST, as per Aranea. > > > > -Aris > > nttpf > > -- > aarnea > > > -- > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 22 Oct

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread Aris Merchant
There's one way it could be, although it seems unlikely and is going to be dismissed as too fuzzy. It has to do with how wrong something has to be to not be a report. One could argue that there is a fundamental difference between something that is clearly factually incorrect and something that's

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread Aris Merchant
On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Kerim Aydin > wrote: > > > > Anyone have arguments why the counterscam didn't work, assuming > Alexis's idea works (in general) in the first place? > > If absolute accuracy is required,

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I think we just call it "converging the gamestate" (very much not new to > Alexis.  Here you go. > > Maybe we don't need a new term, but I was talking about

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread Aris Merchant
On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I think we just call it "converging the gamestate" (very much not new to > Alexis. Here you go. > Maybe we don't need a new term, but I was talking about the specific case where the person in an office was unclear.

Re: DIS: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7818-19

2016-10-22 Thread Luis Ressel
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:22:03 -0700 Aris Merchant wrote: > I vote as follows: > > > > 7818+ ais523 1.0 Make Spending Power More Useful > > FOR, on the grounds that the ADoP can remove the Promotor (or at > least start an election) Besides, you can

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, ais523 wrote: > > > On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 22:02 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, 13:41 Luis Ressel wrote: > > > > Congrats to our new Promotor! I'm glad something is interested in > > > >