Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3537 reassigned to o

I experienced this same issue in my mail program. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jul 29, 2017, at 7:40 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > On 07/29/2017 06:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: >> My terminal email reader shows no formatting

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3537 reassigned to o

On 07/29/2017 06:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: My terminal email reader shows no formatting distinction between the new and old parts of your message. As such, until I read more carefully, I was about to complain that it was now too late for you to move to reconsideration. It is possible that

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3537 reassigned to o

My terminal email reader shows no formatting distinction between the new and old parts of your message. As such, until I read more carefully, I was about to complain that it was now too late for you to move to reconsideration. It is possible that the raw html format version contains some kind

DIS: Re: BUS: New Proposal: "Agoraculture"

On Jul 29, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Ajay Kumar Raja wrote: > Proposal "Agoraculture": I’m intensely positive about the bones of this proposal, and hope to see it developed into something we can enact. Voting strength is an interesting (bordering on dangerous) gameplay

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration as a player

On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 10:12 -0700, Ajay Kumar Raja wrote: > I would like to register as a player. Welcome to Agora! On Jul 29, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > Welcome! > > Just as a note, you normally have to be quite precise with your > language when taking

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration as a player

On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 10:12 -0700, Ajay Kumar Raja wrote: > I would like to register as a player. Welcome! Just as a note, you normally have to be quite precise with your language when taking actions in Agora (registration is an exception, which is why this (probably) works). Saying that you'd

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3537 reassigned to o

I have looked again and believe the sequence of events is convoluted and includes both a failed recusal (sent to A-D) and a failed second motion to reconsider (you can only file one) but the long and short of it is that there exists a final judgement which was not mooted (it was one vote short and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 00:34 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Jul 28, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Nic Evans wrote: > > Real idea: Ratify the Ruleset every Read the Ruleset Week. > Seconded. I like this idea, but it should be a tradition that we do so via proposal, as opposed to something

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3537 reassigned to o

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 22:44 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > P.S. Honourable Arbitor, it may have been useful had you spelled out > that this was a moot specifically. We don’t have those often and many > players, myself included, are unfamiliar with them. I nearly forgot > to spell out that I was

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] [Probably] Weekly Report

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 22:29 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > It is no longer possible for me to impose summary judgement on > Cuddlebeam, as e is presently not a player. I actually do have a good > argument for why a card would be appropriate, but it’s irrelevant, as > carding Cuddlebeam now would