If the ruleset self ratified shit would hit the fan. Note: this was
discussed when Gaelan put an Apathy attempt into the SLR a few months ago.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 17:57 Cuddle Beam wrote:
> FUCK
> U
> C
> K
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Publius Scribonius
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> Lots of ?s that should be 's
Oh, $##!@$#!@. I spent a lot of time replacing smart quotes in lots of
peoples' judgements and missed those (that was like 75% of the editing
effort). thx.
Lots of ?s that should be 's
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3552
> (This document is informational only and contains no game actions).
>
> == CFJ 3552
H. Secretary o,
You called CFJ 3550, but after it was assigned a judge you attempted
to retract it (retraction failed as it had a judge). Is a judgement
still needed/relevant? If so, I'll reassign for a (hopefully)
appropriate judgement; if not, I'll reassign to myself and judge it
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> test
This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system.
Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have
involved CuddleBeam.
Auctions became unregulated. It was just "an auction" and such. Presumably
I could just make my own.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given
that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing.
The last paragraph of rule 2491 is duplicated. I don't see how that allows
any scam though...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that
your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing.
Gaelan
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam
On 09/18/17 20:01, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I’m sorry, I overreacted.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
I don't think you're the one being reactionary here.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I’m sorry, I overreacted.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:00 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> Yeah I thought the SLR self-ratified. My bad, sorry.
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Publius Scribonius
Yeah I thought the SLR self-ratified. My bad, sorry.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Are you paying any attention to what you are doing?
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam
which relied on timing and I wanted to see what time appeared on the
archives for my message to compare with a-o.
Sorry for any concerns.
Also, my scam didn't work because the SLR isn't self-ratifying and now I
cry in a
Are you paying any attention to what you are doing?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:56 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> By virtue of R2491 and having the highest bid during an auction (which is now
> over), I
FUCK
U
C
K
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The SLR is not self-ratifying.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Cuddle Beam
The SLR is not self-ratifying.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> This:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg08270.html is
> now Ratifie (one week
The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be having
email problems.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
> I received it too (but already deleted it,
I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could
spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it?
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I
I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am slightly
concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
>
Uh oh.
-Aris
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:22 PM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> test
>
test
20 matches
Mail list logo