Re: DIS: Overpowered - does it work as intended

Well - You noticed because you helped me develop the scam. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:40 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > The way I read it, e doesn't have to be Overpowered when you announce your > intent > to Demand Resignation, but e has to be Overpowered when you actually

Re: DIS: Overpowered - does it work as intended

The way I read it, e doesn't have to be Overpowered when you announce your intent to Demand Resignation, but e has to be Overpowered when you actually follow through on the Demand and remove em. This is generally in keeping with most dependent actions, you don't actually have to be capable of

DIS: Overpowered - does it work as intended

So - I was overpowered for a small amount of time [Cuz it seems like I'm speaker, and I was PM at the same moment via a neat micro-scam that no-one noticed or cared about, and was also protected by the overpowered rule], but looking at the rules, they seem broken a bit? R2472 If a player

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: QAZ is out

Because currently you can't modify or create new agencies with QAZ I think i'm fine? On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:17 PM Cuddle Beam wrote: > Well, not actually doing it lol, but for the sport of figuring out methods > and cool things. > > (I agree with that QAZ should leave

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: QAZ is out

I can't think of any ways that would postpone this more than 24 hours or so at most, if Quazie responds appropriately to defend against attempts. Thinking of the defenses was a slightly-interesting puzzle, happy to share after QAZ is actually gone. On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: QAZ is out

Well, not actually doing it lol, but for the sport of figuring out methods and cool things. (I agree with that QAZ should leave regardless) On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is possible that such a method potentially exists.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: QAZ is out

It is possible that such a method potentially exists. However, I don't think it would be particularly sporting to use it if it did, so I'm not going to say anything more than that. -Aris On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > For the sport of it, would there

DIS: Re: BUS: QAZ is out

For the sport of it, would there be a way to prevent this? On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Quazie wrote: > I intend to revoke QAZ in 24 hours. >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3552 Judged FALSE by o

Sure - but don't mean to imply it's a big deal in the grand scheme of things... On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Would it be helpful if we did not use smart quotes? > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Sep

Re: DIS: test

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > test > > This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system. > > Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have > involved CuddleBeam I

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3552 Judged FALSE by o

Would it be helpful if we did not use smart quotes? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 19, 2017, at 12:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> Lots of ?s that should be 's > > Oh,