Ah no problem man. I might go for Tailor or something instead, not sure.
On 4/8/2018 2:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh, sorry ATMunn - should get to the end of messages before quick responses.
I deputized because, since I was the one who pushed for officer-blotting
that led to the resignation, I
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, omd wrote:
Yeah, it was caught in the queue due to being over 500K. I approved
it and changed the limit for all lists to 1500K. Sorry. (Now if only
Mailman supported *synchronously* rejecting messages, so rejections
could be reported to the sending SMTP client: that way th
I tend to agree that some way of making patch proposals free is worthwhile.
Writing such proposals is entirely a public service. If anything, people
should be paid for them.
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:14 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On one hand several of us were proposing far more than 2 a
Here’s a new version of my proto-contract from a while ago.
{
If this contract has no coins, it accepts transfers of a single coin. If it has
no papers, it accepts transfers of a single paper.
This contract maintains a piece of state known as the Patch Puddle, containing
a set of Patches each c
On one hand several of us were proposing far more than 2 a month, especially
those of us who did a lot of bug-finding - at 2 a month I'd personally save
for proposals that are "interesting" rather than bug fixes. On the other
hand, others of us weren't, and maybe a contract could automate folks
We all already get 2 paper a month, so I'm worried about reintroducing
without objection and making mills worthless.
I'm gonna try and write a contract to coordinate the altruism but I don't
know if it'll work.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> That is v. annoying. I'm
Oh, if it's just "an office" you're after and don't care which, the Tailor
has gone silent too...
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Oh, sorry ATMunn - should get to the end of messages before quick responses.
> I deputized because, since I was the one who pushed for officer-blotting
> th
The Herald is reminded of quarterly reductions that were required
April 1. :)
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
> Court:
>
> KarmaEntity
> -
> SAMURAI
> -
> +4 Aris <-- SHOGUN
> +3 G.
> +2 ATMunn
> +2 Alexis
> +2 Telnaior
> +2 o
> +2
Oh, sorry ATMunn - should get to the end of messages before quick responses.
I deputized because, since I was the one who pushed for officer-blotting
that led to the resignation, I figured I should carry through on the standard.
I won't nominate myself for the actual election.
On Sun, 8 Apr 201
That is v. annoying. I'm not feeling altruistic (I mean I might once, but
not against an ongoing defect in the rules) - I wonder how if people will
pay for bugfixes? Anyway, I don't plan to pay to pend it - not asking anyone
else to but feel free if you like :P
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, Kenyon Prat
Wait, when’d you become ADoP? I don’t see a deputization.
Gaelan
> On Apr 8, 2018, at 6:40 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>
> Oh man, it's been so long since I've been ADoP so I forget if I can do this
> but if I can:
>
> I initiate an election for Referee, and become a candidate in that election.
>
> I
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 8:05 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Not sure how it works on a-o but a-b has a 500K limit.
>
> I sent omd an email about the stuck email, just in case.
Yeah, it was caught in the queue due to being over 500K. I approved
it and changed the limit for all lists to 1500K. Sorry.
12 matches
Mail list logo