I'm pretty sure it's the first *Birthday* tournament/contest win if that's
a distinction worth making. The previous ones were more like the "free
tournaments" rule now, and played out over a longer time IIRC, less like an
event.
the inspiration for the "birthday" tournament was the
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I thought I'd modify the regulations to fix all the problems we found,
> and to make them more generic.
I *was* planning to do that you know. :)
But you get most of what I noticed needed fixing. I'll work a bit on
#6 and #11 because there's a
I think I am going to take the approach of renaming it all as a contest.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:16 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I'll leave it up the the herald, but "Tournaments" are basically synonymous
> with "championship" (they used to be called "championship contests").
> But
I'll leave it up the the herald, but "Tournaments" are basically synonymous
with "championship" (they used to be called "championship contests").
But "championship" is completely unintuitive so I'd rename em all to
tournament or maybe the more historically-used "contest"?
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018,
That sounds like an interesting mechanism to try to recreate.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:12 PM Alex Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 18:06 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > Champions by Tournament, huh. I believe that's a new one.
>
> It's a very similar mechanism to Championship (although
It is, but I couldn't think of something better.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:07 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> Champions by Tournament, huh. I believe that's a new one.
>
> -Aris
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:03 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, that makes sense.
> >
> > As
On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 18:06 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Champions by Tournament, huh. I believe that's a new one.
It's a very similar mechanism to Championship (although admittedly one
of the Championship wins was a scam). It may be different enough to
list it separately, though.
Come to think
Champions by Tournament, huh. I believe that's a new one.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:03 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>
> Okay, that makes sense.
>
> As Herald, I grant Aris and myself the patent title Champion.
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:58 PM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> >
> >
Regulations 4 and 5 suggest that strikes for invalidity are automatic.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:49 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> G., could you declare a strike here? I think you need to before everything
> ends.
>
> Publius
Because then it's not a tournament, which lasts for a little while, it's a
committee, which is semi-permanent.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:49 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not make it automatically renewing like FRC, so once one round
G., could you declare a strike here? I think you need to before everything ends.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:21 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> I submit the following rule:
>
> I'd like to thank the court for it's service. This tournament was amazing.
> The play
Why not make it automatically renewing like FRC, so once one round
ends, the winner determines the theme and becomes a judge? Or would
that just turn it into FRC?
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:33 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> I thought I'd modify the regulations to fix all the problems we found,
> and
I thought I'd modify the regulations to fix all the problems we found,
and to make them more generic.
Change log:
*Make a bunch of minor phrasing and capitalization adjustments.
*Remove all elements specific to this incarnation of the tournament.
*Adjust the way time limits work for appeals, so
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:02 PM P. Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is from a non-authenticated email service.
>
Receipt acknowledged.
-Aris
This is from a non-authenticated email service.
I messed around with some settings and now it is working properly.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:56 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing
> characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the
> rest of you?
>
>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:50 AM Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 08:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Oh sorry, Aris's is deeply-hidden in the distribution message. Bad Aris.
> > (that goes beyond my personal bounds for ambiguity, but I'm not the
> officer
> > so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ )
>
> We
needs an explicit declaration of monospace typestyle:
[image: needs monospace.PNG]
Here it is in monospace, gmail's "fixed width" option:
> ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐
> │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│
>
Thanks for taking a look!
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 2:18 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> I've actually been having intermittent problems connecting to GitHub at all,
> so my guess would be a temporary glitch or DoS attack or something on their
> end. I certainly can't see any problems with your
I've actually been having intermittent problems connecting to GitHub at all, so
my guess would be a temporary glitch or DoS attack or something on their end. I
certainly can't see any problems with your markup.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 16, 2018 5:53 PM, Publius
Would anyone be willing to take a look at this and tell me if they see
anything to cause the error?
-- Forwarded message -
From: GitHub
Date: Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 1:52 PM
Subject: [AgoraNomic/Library] Page build failure
To: PubliusScriboniusScholasticus
The page build failed
I vote, on behalf of myself and my zombie, as Aris has, on all
proposals included below, except 8068 and 8069, on which I vote, on
behalf of myself and my zombie, as follows:
8068: FOR
8069: AGAINST
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:09 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> I vote as follows:
>
> > ID
Looks sharp/nice/correct to me.
With the usual exception of that Japanese line (but it's less out-of-line
then other reports have been).
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing
> characters
> actually have wide
Hmm. Perhaps an experiment to shelve for the time being. 樂
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 16, 2018 3:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>
>
> =E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=
>
>
=E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=
=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=
=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=
I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing characters
actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the rest of you?
-twg
┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐
│Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│
On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 08:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Oh sorry, Aris's is deeply-hidden in the distribution message. Bad Aris.
> (that goes beyond my personal bounds for ambiguity, but I'm not the officer
> so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ )
We should probably legislate a standard for this. A successful scam I
Oh sorry, Aris's is deeply-hidden in the distribution message. Bad Aris.
(that goes beyond my personal bounds for ambiguity, but I'm not the officer
so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ )
twg's definitely wasn't delivered to me (or caught in spam at my end).
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> There's at
Aris pended the proposals in the same message as eir Promotor report, which may
be why you can't find them in the archives.
Just for once, I'm actually not missing any emails, which is nice but sadly
doesn't help solve the problem.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 16, 2018
There's at least two messages that weren't received by me in the last 24 hours:
- Aris's pend-with-paper that I can't even find in the archives.
- twg's receiving of coins from Foundry (which is in the archives at least).
(I'm inferring the existence of both of these from twg's Report).
On
It's on the spamcop.net blacklist again right now FWIW, and I'm not
receiving email.
The blacklist blocks via spamtrap email addresses, so presumably one of
them got on a list somehow (vandals?) or otherwise Comex's server is
infested with spam malware.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 15 Jul
31 matches
Mail list logo
