Yes. People not votes for quorum
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After reading Rules 2422 and 683, I think your vote still counts toward
> quorum, which is good.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 4:11 PM Rebecca wrote:
>
> > I
After reading Rules 2422 and 683, I think your vote still counts toward
quorum, which is good.
-Aris
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 4:11 PM Rebecca wrote:
> I imposed summary judgement on myself on Jul 15, bringing me to 3 blots,
> moving my voting strength to 0. This is a CoE on the resolution of
ATMunn's been sitting on it for a long time.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I called the CFJ on June 24 and argued that summary judgement DIDN'T
> prevent
> a payday:
>
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/
> agora-business/2018-June/038657.html
>
the result never got judged (poke ATMunn). but to me the result is clear:
the provision for making fines forgivable is _only_ contained within the
Cold Hand of Justice Rule.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I thought I remembered CFJing on this question in the last few
I called the CFJ on June 24 and argued that summary judgement DIDN'T prevent
a payday:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-June/038657.html
but I don't see it listed in the next Gazette so maybe it was missed? (this
was also during the peak of the
I thought I remembered CFJing on this question in the last few months, but
don't remember seeing the result (and couldn't find it in a quick Gazette
search). Anyone remember? Boy I really really really need to get the CFJ
database up-to-date again.
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote:
> I
I was sloppy with these, too. Summary Judgement fines are not
forgivable by definition. Therefore I am not eligible for a Ref salary
this month.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Rebecca wrote:
> There is one person recently late on reports (myself) and three people
> very late on CFJs. One of
I was sloppy in these messages: I didn't explicitly state that these
were forgivable. But I think the imposition of an apology word
automatically makes it so.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Rebecca wrote:
> I find both of these finger points valid. Because these are two
> separate finger
Proposal 8072 changes processing facilities' upkeep costs from 3 coins to 3
steel.
We really need a Rulekeepor, don't we.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 26, 2018 9:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I pay the following upkeep costs for the indicated facilities:
>
> > E (+3, -2)
Yes, that's true. Seeing your objection, I only looked at the 24 hours
from that and forgot about the base deadline. Sorry.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 5:12 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> By my count you're still a few hours short? (just don't want any further
>
By my count you're still a few hours short? (just don't want any further
ambiguity at all).
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I hereby ratify the following document, having received no objection,
> as intended:
> {
> The quorum on each of the decisions to
NttPF, not that it actually makes any difference to anything now anyway.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 26, 2018 9:06 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I hereby ratify the following document, having received no objection,
> as intended:
> {
> The quorum on each of
I hereby ratify the following document, having received no objection,
as intended:
{
The quorum on each of the decisions to adopt Proposals 8066-8076 is 5.
}
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:48 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Ok sure i withdraw this objection.
Currency revaluations are a standard solution to runaway inflation. :)
-Aris
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 5:52 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> tone came across wrong - read that with a smiley, not genuinely annoyed :)
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Since the current Prime Minister
Just FYI, Aris and Assessor twg, I misread the list because I think
you have authorship wrong for 8080? (I misread 8081 as being v3 by Aris).
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Aaand ... misread the list. I change my vote on 8081 to FOR.
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
tone came across wrong - read that with a smiley, not genuinely annoyed :)
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Since the current Prime Minister seems to favor pure legislative theft,
> I see no reason to play "nice" here:
>
> I bid 75 coins in every one of the below auctions.
>
> On
16 matches
Mail list logo
