> - "Automatic rules repeals" are a little dangerous because
> if there's uncertainty as to the conditions the ruleset may change
> automagically without visible trace. It's generally better to tie ruleset
> changes to a required statement of change that can be hunted up in
> the lists, and even b
For what it's worth, I'm interested in Spaaace!, but not enough to put
time yet into assembling a new Astronomor's report when more basic
officers' duties are unfilled.
Is there much harm in just leaving the Astronomor office (effectively)
vacant until someone finds the time? Not that I feel stron
Oops, you're right that the first auction is over. And I'd hoped that
was a new loophole I'd discovered.
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 01:31, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> The first one's over now right?
> (fwiw, I plan to bid again to keep the 2nd auction going so you
> can't claim two :) )
>
>
> On 5/9/201
The first one's over now right?
(fwiw, I plan to bid again to keep the 2nd auction going so you
can't claim two :) )
On 5/9/2019 4:53 PM, James Cook wrote:
Two zombie auctions are ongoing.
First auction. Initiated 2019-05-04.
Lots:
1. Tarhalindur
Bids:
2019-05-04 15:44 UTC. Falsif
> IDAuthor(s) AITitle
> ---
> 8176 G. 2.0 Zombies take care of this now
On Proposal 8176 I vote AGAINST if a Notice of Veto has been published
specifying Proposal 8176, otherwise FOR.
Oh, and you might also want to add an "in ascending numerical order"
after each instance of "are automatically repealed".
-Aris
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:55 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> I think for the space rules you meant rules 2593 and 2594, rather than 259.
>
>
> -Aris
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2019
I think for the space rules you meant rules 2593 and 2594, rather than 259.
-Aris
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:02 AM D Margaux wrote:
>
> We should probably do something about Spaace and Politics, since there’s
> little interest in them, but the rules have lots of obligations that are
> going unf
On 5/9/2019 8:21 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
>> On May 9, 2019, at 11:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> But overall, I'm not sure that this is an improvement over a straight up
>> repeal, followed by a simple "re-enact Rules XXX, YYY" if someone wants
>> to bring it back?
>
> I agree it’s probably not
> On May 9, 2019, at 11:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> But overall, I'm not sure that this is an improvement over a straight up
> repeal, followed by a simple "re-enact Rules XXX, YYY" if someone wants to
> bring it back?
I agree it’s probably not an improvement. I mostly wrote it up this way
If we take this route, I think whomever revives and takes the office should
be under an added penalty to stick with the office - "if a player does this,
e must perform all the Astronomor duties with no late duties for at least
60 days".
But overall, I'm not sure that this is an improvement over
I bid a coin as well.
Gaelan
> On May 9, 2019, at 6:54 AM, James Cook wrote:
>
> I initiate a zombie auction, with the following lots (each zombie a
> separate lot) ordered as follows (highest-bid first):
>
> 1. V.J. Rada
> 2. Telnaior
> 3. L
> 4. Baron von Vaderham
>
> Agora is the Auctionee
11 matches
Mail list logo