I'll be a good Agoran if such a proposal makes it through. But I'm also
understanding of the reason this limit exists, even if I think 30 days is a
bit much.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019, 3:16 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk <
ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 07:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 18:38, Jason Cobb wrote:
> Title: Double Jeopardy Prevention Act
Is this a serious problem? If the current referee really wants to levy
a fine for something a previous referee found to be Shenanigans, the
accused is still protected by items (2) and (3). Those are likely to
On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 07:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> idk, as much as I don't want nch to sit out for 30 days, we've had people
> deregister themselves to do a scam and in the past said "hey well that's the
> price of scamming" (if it was accidental for non-scammy reasons we try to
> get em back
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 15:00, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 7/25/2019 7:38 AM, James Cook wrote:
> > Title: Fresh start
> > Co-authors: (empty list)
> > Adoption index: 3.1
> > Text: {
> > Register nch.
> > nch receives a Welcome Package.
> > Destroy all of nch's Coins.
> > }
>
> idk, as much
Ah, that makes sense, sorry.
Jason Cobb
On 7/25/19 2:22 PM, James Cook wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 16:07, Jason Cobb wrote:
Also, if you want em to have the welcome package, you might not want to
destroy all of eir coins after giving it to em.
Jason Cobb
The purpose was to effectively
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 16:07, Jason Cobb wrote:
> Also, if you want em to have the welcome package, you might not want to
> destroy all of eir coins after giving it to em.
>
> Jason Cobb
The purpose was to effectively deny em a welcome package.
I’m not particularly eager to restart the objection period over this minor
a mistake, especially given how late the tournament already is. I intend to
invoke Regulation 13 in the manner put forward by G.
-Aris
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:32 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Just mentioning this for
Just mentioning this for everyone who's not played a Tournament before!
Not commenting on your specifics, but note Regulation 13. We
frequently use such a clause to let the tournament runner solve common
sense issues like this with an interpretive decision that has a high
bar ("arbitrary and
Just realized this: the fantasy rule that a player publishes to join
doesn't take effect, since "only contestants can publish valid fantasy
rules".
This may be intentional, but I don't know.
Jason Cobb
On 7/24/19 6:57 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I intend, Without 3 Objections, to enact the
Also, if you want em to have the welcome package, you might not want to
destroy all of eir coins after giving it to em.
Jason Cobb
On 7/25/19 10:38 AM, James Cook wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 14:33, James Cook wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 01:30, nch wrote:
Oops, oh well. Guess I'm
On 7/25/2019 7:59 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 7/25/2019 7:38 AM, James Cook wrote:
> > Title: Fresh start
> > Co-authors: (empty list)
> > Adoption index: 3.1
> > Text: {
> > Register nch.
> > nch receives a Welcome Package.
> > Destroy all of nch's Coins.
> > }
Just on a purely
On 7/25/2019 7:38 AM, James Cook wrote:
> Title: Fresh start
> Co-authors: (empty list)
> Adoption index: 3.1
> Text: {
> Register nch.
> nch receives a Welcome Package.
> Destroy all of nch's Coins.
> }
idk, as much as I don't want nch to sit out for 30 days, we've had people
deregister
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 14:33, James Cook wrote:
> I submit a proposal as follows.
>
> Title: Fresh start
> Co-authors: (empty list)
> Adoption index: 3.01
> Text: {
> Register nch.
> nch receives a Welcome Package.
> Destroy all of nch's Coins.
> }
I believe the "Register nch." provision is
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 23:55, Rebecca wrote:
> I retract that proposal and substitute this one.
>
> Title: No secret contracts
> AI: 2.5
> Text: Destroy each contract the full text of which has not been posted in
> public. If this destroyed Agora, put it back again the same as it was.
> Nobody
14 matches
Mail list logo
