DIS: Proto-tournament: Nomaoic

2019-11-03 Thread Gaelan Steele
[TL;DR: Nomic, but the ruleset isn’t published and proposals are private. The intention is that you’d make your proposal, and share the next with just enough people to get a majority voting for it.] Initial Set of Rules Immutable Rules 101. All players must always abide by all the rules then in

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

2019-11-03 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/3/19 10:51 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: Only a comment, since this isn't self-ratifying: ais523 is only a player if CFJ 3776 is judged TRUE. Sorry, ais523 is only a /candidate/ if CFJ 3776 is judged TRUE. -- Jason Cobb

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

2019-11-03 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/3/19 1:41 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: ELECTIONS Office Initiated   Phase   Candidates Prime Minister 2019-11-03  Nominating  Murphy Speaker    2019-10-20  

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Interested proposals

2019-11-03 Thread Ørjan Johansen
How did I end up co-author of that? Greetings, Ørjan. On Sun, 3 Nov 2019, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: Proposal: Interested proposals (co-author = Oerjan) Create a rule titled "Interested Proposals" with this text: Interest is an untracked proposal switch with values

Re: DIS: Proto: review period

2019-11-03 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 12:44 AM Gaelan Steele wrote: > > I am considering, as part of my plotting-to-become-rulekeepor work, some sort > of automatic proposal generator (basically, some sort of web-based interface > for editing the ruleset, get changes dumped into a human-readable proposal). >

Re: DIS: Test of a-d

2019-11-03 Thread ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 10:58 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: > This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject > line ahead of time. I received this (and the a-b and a-o versions too). The mailing list rewrote the "From:" line in order to prevent a DMARC

DIS: Test of a-d

2019-11-03 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject line ahead of time.

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8253-8265

2019-11-03 Thread Gaelan Steele
I note that I’m actively working on producing an updated ruleset—if anyone is doing the same, please get in touch so we can avoid duplicating work. Gaelan > On Nov 3, 2019, at 8:57 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > > I find that the Agoran decisions on whether to adopt proposals 8257 and 8259 > were

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-11-03 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/3/19 2:18 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: ID Author(s)AITitle --- 8266 nch 1.0 Glitter 8267 Jason Cobb 3.0 Emerald Ribbons 8268 Jason Cobb 3.0

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-11-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
8271 G. 3.0 Doctorate expectations I withdrew 8271 and submitted a new version - the text of this one is the old text. https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-November/041621.html

Re: DIS: Proto: review period

2019-11-03 Thread Gaelan Steele
I am considering, as part of my plotting-to-become-rulekeepor work, some sort of automatic proposal generator (basically, some sort of web-based interface for editing the ruleset, get changes dumped into a human-readable proposal). Obviously something like that catching on would benefit me

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-11-03 Thread Aris Merchant
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is

Re: DIS: Proto: review period

2019-11-03 Thread Aris Merchant
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:03 PM Gaelan Steele wrote: > > Replies inline. > > Gaelan > > > On Oct 31, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: > > > > On 10/31/19 8:28 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > >> { > >> Amend rule 2350 “Proposals” as follows: > >> * replace “A player CAN create a proposal by