Re: DIS: Ideas for Obligation System Development

2019-11-07 Thread Aris Merchant
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:28 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > > On 11/7/19 6:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I was working on a Contract fix back in Sept that I have some > > half-finished language for. It: > > > > - Defines public contracts, and requires contracts to be public in > > order to hold currency o

Re: DIS: Ideas for Obligation System Development

2019-11-07 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/7/19 6:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: I was working on a Contract fix back in Sept that I have some half-finished language for. It: - Defines public contracts, and requires contracts to be public in order to hold currency or authorize act-on-behalfs or ENABLE anything else at all. Was undecid

Re: DIS: Ideas for Obligation System Development

2019-11-07 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:32 PM Aris Merchant wrote: > Okay, I've had a bunch of ideas for developments around contracts and the > like. I've been working on a proposal, but I wanted to solicit public > comment before going ahead with it. > > * Create an office of Notary, responsible for tracking c

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: This one's a scam

2019-11-07 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/7/19 5:42 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: Even if your scheme works in general, it might fail due to the specific case you chose to test. “by announcement by its owner” has the word “announcement” limited by “by its owner”. That likely makes it a different thing from just “by announcement”. I do

DIS: Re: BUS: This one's a scam

2019-11-07 Thread Aris Merchant
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:16 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > I transfer 500 of D. Margaux's Coins to Jason Cobb. > > [Anti-No Faking (although the CFJ should make it obvious): the above > action might not work.] > > > I CFJ, barring D. Margaux: "In this message, Jason Cobb transferred a > Coin." > > Eviden

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: This one's a scam

2019-11-07 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Jason Cobb wrote: On 11/7/19 5:18 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: [snip] Rule 478/36 Fora [Excerpt] Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously and clearly specifying the action and annou

DIS: Ideas for Obligation System Development

2019-11-07 Thread Aris Merchant
Okay, I've had a bunch of ideas for developments around contracts and the like. I've been working on a proposal, but I wanted to solicit public comment before going ahead with it. * Create an office of Notary, responsible for tracking contracts, pledges, and promises (see below). I don't particula

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: This one's a scam

2019-11-07 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/7/19 5:18 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Jason Cobb wrote: I transfer 500 of D. Margaux's Coins to Jason Cobb. [Anti-No Faking (although the CFJ should make it obvious): the above action might not work.] I CFJ, barring D. Margaux: "In this message, Jason Cobb transferr

DIS: Re: BUS: This one's a scam

2019-11-07 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Jason Cobb wrote: I transfer 500 of D. Margaux's Coins to Jason Cobb. [Anti-No Faking (although the CFJ should make it obvious): the above action might not work.] I CFJ, barring D. Margaux: "In this message, Jason Cobb transferred a Coin." Evidence: { Rule 478/36 Fora

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Election

2019-11-07 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/7/19 3:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: I was waiting for Arbitor for the proposal to pass first :) The nomination period for the election would end ~1 day after proposals can be resolved (assuming quorum is reached), and I plan to resolve relatively quickly, so it should be fine even if it's

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Election

2019-11-07 Thread Kerim Aydin
I was waiting for Arbitor for the proposal to pass first :) On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:51 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > > I initiate an election for Assessor. > > I become a candidate in this election. Election speech: I think I've > been a decent Assessor so far, and I'd like to continue. > > -- > Jason

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: This one's a scam

2019-11-07 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/7/19 4:04 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: Rule 2152/7 (Power=3) Mother, May I? If a rule specifies one or more persons in connection with a term, then the term applies only to the specified person(s). -twg Here's my logic (perhaps articulated a bit mo

DIS: Re: BUS: This one's a scam

2019-11-07 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 4:16 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > Transferring D. Margaux's Coins is an action defined by the Rules that > 'CAN be performed "by announcement"' (even if the intent is only that it > CAN be performed by announcement by a single person), satisfying the > first criterion in