Here's a draft of my Promotorial style guide. I'd appreciate comments.
It's written in my characteristic verbose style. I'm happy to
formulate a condensed version if people agree with the idea, but would
prefer something they can read more quickly.
-Aris
---
OFFICE OF THE PROMOTOR: OFFICIAL STYLE
On 11/9/19 7:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Rather, I think that this clause does definition-by-properties of "by
announcement", where it ascribes properties to a phrase, but doesn't
give
an actual textual definition to the phrase. I think this is conceptually
similar to how the Rules don't say
On 11/9/2019 2:53 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
On 11/9/19 5:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
In the R478 text:
> Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by
> announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously and
> clearly specifying the action and announcing that e
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 8, 2019 11:00 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3781. I assign it to G..
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3781
>
> === CFJ 3781 ===
>
> In this
On 11/9/19 5:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
In the R478 text:
> Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by
> announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously and
> clearly specifying the action and announcing that e performs it.
The word "define" indicates
Proto-judgement for CFJ 3781:
In the R478 text:
> Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by
> announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously and
> clearly specifying the action and announcing that e performs it.
The word "define" indicates that it is
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 4:31 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Okay, I've had a bunch of ideas for developments around contracts and the
> like. I've been working on a proposal, but I wanted to solicit public
> comment before going ahead with it.
>
> - Create
7 matches
Mail list logo
