On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 9:25 PM Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Gratuitous postmortem arguments on CFJ 3796:
>
> I don't think it's necessary to bring Rule 217 into this at all; scams
> of this type simply can't work. I'll explain why I think that.
>
> Imagine that the city of Grand
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:18, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Well, the outcome is defined by a calculation given by the rules. So
> if, say, an AI=1 proposal has votes FOR equal to votes AGAINST, then
> its outcome is REJECTED. So ratifying outcome means ratifying that
> F>A. But what
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:21 AM James Cook wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 01:30, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > then a legal fiction is established that the belief was true at the time of
> > the earliest public message indicating the belief; and the gamestate is
> > therefore
Gratuitous postmortem arguments on CFJ 3796:
I don't think it's necessary to bring Rule 217 into this at all; scams
of this type simply can't work. I'll explain why I think that.
Imagine that the city of Grand Rapids, Michigan enacts an ordinance
which states that, the United States Constitution
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 01:30, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
> then a legal fiction is established that the belief was true at the time of
> the earliest public message indicating the belief; and the gamestate is
> therefore altered as though the belief had been true at that time, in
Are we sure the first attempt at resolving the decisions didn't
succeed? I've lost track.
In case we're a the situation like Alexis outlined, where the first
succeeds platonically and this one succeeds via self-ratification, I
tried to work out what happened if these proposals were enacted twice.
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 03:50, Aris Merchant via agora-business
wrote:
> ---
> Title: Promotorial Assignment
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-author(s):
> Chamber: Legislation
>
> Amend the rule entitled "Proposal Chambers" by adding the text
> "If a proposal in the Proposal Pool has its
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 03:25, Alexis Hunt via agora-business
wrote:
> Amend Rule 2574 (Zombie Life Cycle) by:
> - replacing the first two paragraphs with: {
> Any player CAN, with notice, putrefy player who has not made a public
missing word? "putrefy a player"
> announcement in the past 60
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 22:15, omd via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > 8316* Alexis 3.0 Zombie voting package
> PRESENT; the fact that the new Rule 683 clause forces default votes to
> be "valid" means that they could be submitted even by ineligible
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 18:17, Aris Merchant via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > I support. For those who don’t understand the reference, see [1][2] (at
> > least I think the first one is part of it; I know the second is).
> >
> > [1]
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 3:10 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 15:37, Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
> agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > The below CFJ is 3805. I assign it to Aris.
> >
> >
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 15:44, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/31/20 3:42 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > For the record, I just sent the case assignment message, it tripped my
> > spam filter on the return so dunno if enough people
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:09 AM omd wrote:
> This leaves the text as "inconsistent", and Rule 217 informs us to
> augment it by the usual factors. In this case, "game custom" clearly
> supports higher-power rules taking precedence over lower-power ones.
> So does "common sense": the ruleset as a
On 1/31/20 3:42 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> For the record, I just sent the case assignment message, it tripped my
> spam filter on the return so dunno if enough people will see the
> assignment to make it public :)
I got it.
--
Jason Cobb
For the record, I just sent the case assignment message, it tripped my
spam filter on the return so dunno if enough people will see the
assignment to make it public :)
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:46 AM Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
wrote:
>
> Notice of Honour:
> +1
We're in boss just hold em off for a minute while I download the files.
(nice on the "last activity" window didn't know where that part would show up)
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:22 AM Gaelan Steele via agora-business
wrote:
>
> Alright, one more try. I withdraw my CFJ, and submit this one: {
>
On 1/31/20 11:22 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> I Grumble Very Loudly, withdraw *that* CFJ, and submit the following one, now
> wrapped at 68 (and, as an additional safety, uses ES6’s ` strings which
> should work across lines): {
> G really ought to make sure the string
this one is up now (again lmk if it looks like copy/paste errors happened).
On 1/31/2020 8:22 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> I Grumble Very Loudly, withdraw *that* CFJ, and submit the following one, now
> wrapped at 68 (and, as an additional safety, uses ES6’s ` strings which
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 21:49, Alexis Hunt via agora-business
wrote:
> I have two other suggestions after thinking about how to reduce Cyan
> Ribbon shenanigans and make it a more interesting thing to obtain that
> genuinely requires working the officer's duties. First, make it so that a
> player
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 21:46, Alexis Hunt via agora-business
wrote:
> 3. Replacing "The action is to be performed with N Agoran consent, and
> the number
> of Supporters of the intent is less than or equal to N times the number of
> Objectors to the intent." with "The action is to be performed
I Grumble Very Loudly, withdraw *that* CFJ, and submit the following one, now
wrapped at 68 (and, as an additional safety, uses ES6’s ` strings which should
work across lines): {
G really ought to make sure the string (window.location.
href.includes('?'))?window.location.href=
`
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 02:46, omd via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:45 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business
> wrote:
> > Enact a new power-1 rule entitled "Default Mechanisms" reading as follows:
>
> I feel like this makes more sense in a high-power rule so it doesn't
> break
G. wrote:
> Pasted that one in the 3805 record, still getting bad line breaks it looks
> like unless I made a copy/paste error? I could alter line breaks by hand but
> I'm purposefully not gonna help you there (this is a script insertion
> challenge not a social engineering challenge...)
Mm,
Pasted that one in the 3805 record, still getting bad line breaks it looks
like unless I made a copy/paste error? I could alter line breaks by hand but
I'm purposefully not gonna help you there (this is a script insertion
challenge not a social engineering challenge...)
On 1/31/2020 6:43 AM,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 22:37 Alexis Hunt via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend, with 2 Agoran Consent, to award twg the Patent Title of Associate
> of Nomic, subject to the conditions that the person performing the award
> pursuant to this intent is the Herald, the
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:32 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Drat kinda boring:
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3805
The word wrapping broke the script.
26 matches
Mail list logo
