Re: DIS: Sets Feedback

2020-05-23 Thread Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
On 2020-05-22 08:22, nch via agora-discussion wrote: As far as I see it, there's two main options right now: 1) Rewrite the auction [the faithful option] 2) Remove it, leaving no way to get victory cards until a new proposal is passed [the easier option] I do not think just leaving it out is

DIS: Re: BUS: (attn Promotor) Re: [Contest: Rule Golf] Re: Agora willing

2020-05-23 Thread Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
On 2020-05-23 21:21, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: WILL: CAN and SHALL by announcement. Gonna go ahead and repeat the sentiment that if it's abstracted this far, it's probably not even worth having a separate word. Proposal: More conservative implicit announcements (AI = 3,

Re: DIS: New Draft: High Crimes and Treason

2020-05-23 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
PSS wrote: I've rewritten parts of it in response to the various feedback provided. The portion that I have the most concern about is the clause that I added to account for change in office holders over time. I would also appreciate any other feedback as I would would like this to make the next

Re: DIS: Protos: Referral and High Crimes

2020-05-23 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
PSS wrote: On May 22, 2020, at 20:07, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: PSS wrote: If the Referee is the investigator and the Arbitor is not the perpetrator, the Arbitor is the Judge. If the Arbitor is the Investigator or the perpetrator, the Speaker is the

DIS: keys

2020-05-23 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 5/22/2020 3:00 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > I wasn't proposing building it into the auction rules. I was saying > that we should create a type of asset that is tied to a switch. > Proto: keys Create the following rule, Keys: If the rules associate an action with

DIS: New Draft: High Crimes and Treason

2020-05-23 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
I've rewritten parts of it in response to the various feedback provided. The portion that I have the most concern about is the clause that I added to account for change in office holders over time. I would also appreciate any other feedback as I would would like this to make the next distribution.

Re: DIS: Protos: Referral and High Crimes

2020-05-23 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 8:53 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 2020, at 20:07, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion > > wrote: > > > > PSS wrote: > > > >> If the Referee is the investigator and the Arbitor is not the > >> perpetrator, the Arbitor is the

Re: DIS: Auction overhaul first cut

2020-05-23 Thread Alex Smith via agora-discussion
On Friday, 22 May 2020, 22:00:23 GMT, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion wrote: > I wasn't proposing building it into the auction rules. I was saying > that we should create a type of asset that is tied to a switch. Idea with possibly too many interesting implications: allow