DIS: Re: OFF: [Diplonomic 2020] Daily Status of Play: Spring 1903 Part 2

2020-07-18 Thread omd via agora-discussion
at 5:13 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-official wrote: It is now after 00:00 UTC on July 19, 2020, so the fifth negotiating phase has ended and the fifth orders phase has begun. You may now submit orders. Please submit orders if you haven't already. A Bur - Pic A Hol - Bel A

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Dipolnomic proposal

2020-07-18 Thread N. S. via agora-discussion
Damn, ull never know it was me On Sun., 19 Jul. 2020, 11:02 am ATMunn via agora-discussion, < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 7/18/2020 8:58 PM, N. S. via agora-business wrote: > > I make the following diplonomic proposal named eat the rich > > > > Make the following rule 'after

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Dipolnomic proposal

2020-07-18 Thread N. S. via agora-discussion
Pss's interpretation On Sun., 19 Jul. 2020, 11:00 am omd via agora-discussion, < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > at 5:58 PM, N. S. via agora-business > wrote: > > > I make the following diplonomic proposal named eat the rich > > > > Make the following rule 'after each build phase, the

DIS: Re: BUS: Dipolnomic proposal

2020-07-18 Thread ATMunn via agora-discussion
On 7/18/2020 8:58 PM, N. S. via agora-business wrote: I make the following diplonomic proposal named eat the rich Make the following rule 'after each build phase, the power with the most units has one of their units randomly destroyed' This didn't create a proposal; proposals are only

DIS: Re: BUS: Dipolnomic proposal

2020-07-18 Thread omd via agora-discussion
at 5:58 PM, N. S. via agora-business wrote: I make the following diplonomic proposal named eat the rich Make the following rule 'after each build phase, the power with the most units has one of their units randomly destroyed’ What if there’s a tie?

DIS: Re: BUS: [@ADoP] Name and Address Change

2020-07-18 Thread Falsifian via agora-discussion
On 2020-07-18 7:08 p.m., nix via agora-business wrote: As mentioned before (and I will once again confirm it in a reply to this email) I'm switching to this email. I'd also like to use the name "nix" instead of "nch". I can't remember if the rules allow multiple emails; if they do I'd like to

DIS: Re: BUS: [@ADoP] Name and Address Change

2020-07-18 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Sat, 2020-07-18 at 19:08 +, nix via agora-business wrote: > As mentioned before (and I will once again confirm it in a reply to this > email) I'm switching to this email. I'd also like to use the name "nix" > instead of "nch". I can't remember if the rules allow multiple emails; > if

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3862 Assigned to R. Lee

2020-07-18 Thread Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion
Ah, well, I won't insist then... But I'll be ready to pounce when I see the chance!! On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 8:44 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 7/18/2020 11:30 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: > > I motion to reconsider, I don't

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3862 Assigned to R. Lee

2020-07-18 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 7/18/2020 11:30 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: > I motion to reconsider, I don't believe it to be overly hypothetical when > it refers to how Agora itself works. It's a question about Agora's > fundamental way of working. First, I found this tidbit in CFJ 1895: > R2160(d) allows

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3862 Assigned to R. Lee

2020-07-18 Thread Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion
I motion to reconsider, I don't believe it to be overly hypothetical when it refers to how Agora itself works. It's a question about Agora's fundamental way of working. I humbly request support please, Agorans. On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:15 AM N. S. via agora-discussion <

Re: DIS: [Webmastor] Homepage Update Shoutout

2020-07-18 Thread Nix Null via agora-discussion
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, July 18, 2020 11:25 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion wrote: > On 7/18/20 12:13 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote: > > > The homepage (agoranomic.org) has received some internal updates today. > > Trigon took the initiative

Re: DIS: [Webmastor] Homepage Update Shoutout

2020-07-18 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
On 7/18/20 12:13 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote: > The homepage (agoranomic.org) has received some internal updates today. > Trigon took the initiative to figure out how to update the homepage to > github's markdown and jekyll instead of pure html while keeping the classic > two-column

DIS: [Webmastor] Homepage Update Shoutout

2020-07-18 Thread Nch via agora-discussion
The homepage (agoranomic.org) has received some internal updates today. Trigon took the initiative to figure out how to update the homepage to github's markdown and jekyll instead of pure html while keeping the classic two-column look. It doesn't look any different, but this will make the page

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8473-8476

2020-07-18 Thread Nch via agora-discussion
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, July 18, 2020 8:41 AM, nixnull+agora--- via agora-business wrote: > On Saturday, July 18, 2020 8:40:11 AM CDT nixnull+agora--- via agora- > discussion wrote: > > > (This is nch. I might be switching to this email address, playing around > > with

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8473-8476

2020-07-18 Thread nixnull+agora--- via agora-discussion
(This is nch. I might be switching to this email address, playing around with settings right now. I'll send an email from nchagora to prove identity.) If I've submitted any ballots for any proposals listed below, which I don't think I have, I withdraw them. I vote as follows: On Sunday, July

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8473-8476

2020-07-18 Thread nixnull+agora--- via agora-discussion
On Sunday, July 12, 2020 11:23:34 PM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > [Did I get this remotely right? I can't tell what the role your > assessment order played in this.] If I remember correctly, at the time assessment order directly determined quorum and it would've failed quorum