It seems possible to have a contracts-only nomic, lol
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:24 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Putting together a repeal proposal for regs rn.
>
> Fair warning: I agree with the "daunting" feeling, but the rules text
> for
Putting together a repeal proposal for regs rn.
Fair warning: I agree with the "daunting" feeling, but the rules text
for tournaments as contracts is no shorter than tournaments as
regulations (based on looking at a previous version), in fact to me
it's a bit more complex because contracts have
On 4/12/23 14:16, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
Regulations to me feel more daunting, aesthetically, than contracts.
Maybe regulations could be folded into contracts too? (Probably promises as
well?)
Personally, I'd rather remove all of the above than fold them in
together; I've
Regulations to me feel more daunting, aesthetically, than contracts.
Maybe regulations could be folded into contracts too? (Probably promises as
well?)
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 6:15 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:16 AM
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:16 AM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 4/12/23 09:14, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Seeing this game play out, I think it would be possible to simplify the
> > Tournament rules greatly by just making win-granting a power that certain
> > Contracts
On 4/12/23 10:47, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
Exactly, there's an overlap in that both purport to produce some kind of
arbitrary text with certain powers.
Oh I see what you mean. Tournaments are a long-standing part of the game
with a narrow focus. Contracts aren't always
Exactly, there's an overlap in that both purport to produce some kind of
arbitrary text with certain powers.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 4:17 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/12/23 09:14, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Seeing this game
On 4/12/23 09:17, juan via agora-business wrote:
I'm worried about language such as "I commit to the following
document". How flexible is it? For example, could I just say “I play
a hand” and attach a hash?
It really depends on the contract wording and opinions of members of the
contract.
On 4/12/23 09:14, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
Seeing this game play out, I think it would be possible to simplify the
Tournament rules greatly by just making win-granting a power that certain
Contracts can have, if they have the same level of authorization (2 Agoran
consent)
Seeing this game play out, I think it would be possible to simplify the
Tournament rules greatly by just making win-granting a power that certain
Contracts can have, if they have the same level of authorization (2 Agoran
consent) that regular Tournaments currently require, with some safety rails
On 4/12/23 09:03, juan via agora-business wrote:
I CFJ: the contract RPSLS has terminated.
This seems plainly true, unless I'm missing something. Contracts have a
lot of leeway to do this kinds of passive changes. We ceased to be
parties when you published, and it ceased to exist when it had
11 matches
Mail list logo
